Berkshire County
Mount Washington
Data through FY2026; built October 19, 2026.
State House
- 3rd Berkshire · Leigh DavisThe author was a candidate for this seat in 2024.
State Senate
- Berkshire, Hampden, Franklin and Hampshire · Paul W. Mark
School districts
Mount Washington operates no schools of its own and belongs to no regional district in DESE’s FY2026 files.
Regional planning agency
Berkshire Regional Planning Commission
Fairness Index
Mount Washington scores 62 on the Fairness Index for all state aid and 94 for discretionary money. Fifty is a fair share.
All state aid
62 / 10036th of 351 (1 = most above its share)
Rank under other weightings: 17th to 62nd.
Stable high: above 55 under every weighting
Mount Washington received more than its share of state aid on three of four measures; its blended score of 62 stays between 57 and 68 under every weighting tested.
Discretionary money only
94 / 10029th of 351 (1 = most above its share)
Rank under other weightings: 25th to 32nd.
Stable high: above 55 under every weighting
Mount Washington received more than its share of discretionary money on all four measures; its blended score of 94 stays between 92 and 96 under every weighting tested.
Each bar is one way of defining a fair share: Equal, the same per resident; Need, weighted toward poverty, low income and a thin tax base; Burden, by what each program pays for (road miles, bridges, pupils and so on); Effort, by what residents already pay in property tax relative to their income. The line marks 50. The score is the average of the four. Discretionary money is competitive grants and earmarks that name the town. How the index is built.
State money, FY2017–FY2026
Mount Washington’s town government and school districts received $4.3 million in formula aid and $1.2 million in competitive grants over ten years.
Formula aid
$4.3M
$22,393 per resident (17th of 351) · gross
Competitive grants
$1.2M
$6,365 per resident (10th of 351)
Earmark-account payments
$0
$0 per resident (339th of 351)
Each class has its own scale. Bars show dollars paid in each fiscal year.
With 193 residents, a single payment moves Mount Washington’s per-resident figures a long way.
Formula aid is gross: Chapter 70 as DESE attributes it to the town, and cherry-sheet aid before the state deducts charges such as charter tuition and transit assessments, plus other formula programs as paid. Competitive grants and earmark-account payments are Comptroller payments to the town government and its school districts (stage: paid), the same payees as the Fairness Index. Enacted earmarks and earmark payments are different things: enacted earmarks are budget clauses, counted three ways above; earmark-account payments are Comptroller payments to the town government and its school districts from accounts classified as earmarks, which can include prior-year and statewide-program money. Either can be larger. Shared revenue, pass-through contracts, transfers to state entities and unclassified payments, $94,000 in all, are not shown. Rank 1 is the highest amount per resident among 351.
Formula aid is gross; competitive grants and earmark-account payments are as paid. Other classes, $94,000, are not shown.
Earmarks
No local earmark was placed in Mount Washington in ten enacted budgets, FY2017 to FY2026, on any of the three measures.
Names the town
$0
enacted, ten budgets
Placed in the town
$0
enacted, ten budgets
Everything placed
$0
enacted, ten budgets
Losers Club
Member
one of 35 municipalities
Local earmarks are counted three ways: clauses that name Mount Washington; clauses placed in Mount Washington, adding organizations located here; and everything placed, adding state facilities located here. Three ways to count a local earmark.
The Losers Club is the project’s name for the 35 cities and towns with no earmark placed in them in any of the ten budgets. It counts enacted earmarks only. Several members won competitive grants in the same years; those appear under State money above.
| Municipality | Names the town | Placed in the town | Everything placed | Placed, per resident |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tyringham | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Alford | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Aquinnah | $100,000 | $100,000 | $100,000 | $150 |
| Monterey | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Gosnold | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Enacted earmarks and earmark payments are different things: enacted earmarks are budget clauses, counted three ways above; earmark-account payments are Comptroller payments to the town government and its school districts from accounts classified as earmarks, which can include prior-year and statewide-program money. Either can be larger.
What the town carries
Measured against what it maintains, Mount Washington received 1.07 times its proportional share of competitive grant awards.
Local road miles
17.4
341st of 351 · 90.3 per 1,000 residents (4th of 351)
Town-owned bridges, replacement cost
$1.3M
scored exposure $327,000 · none in poor condition
Road-stream crossings
30
315th of 351 · culverts and small crossings
Town-owned hazard dams
0
high or significant hazard
Land area
22.3 sq mi
50% state-owned
Seasonal homes
49%
share of housing units
Peak service population
418
residents plus seasonal
Core infrastructure index
0.00
roads, culverts, dams, coast, flood, energy
The burden index divides the competitive awards Mount Washington received from FY2017 to FY2026 by what it would have received if every program had split its money by its own measure of need: road miles for road programs, crossings for culvert grants, town-owned hazard dams for dam repair, jobs for economic development, residents for libraries. 1.0 is proportional. Mount Washington: 1.07. State median: 0.91. Bridges count by replacement cost and condition, not by number, and only bridges the town owns. Ranks run from 1, the most among 351.
Burden index 1.07; state median 0.91; 1.0 is proportional. Ranks run from 1, the most among 351.
State land and growth
State land eligible for PILOT
8,409 acres
59.0% of land area · FY2026
State-owned land PILOT, FY2026
$359,000
payment in lieu of taxes, cherry sheet
PILOT per eligible acre
$42.68
statewide $117 · FY2026
New growth per resident
$73,200
FY2017–2025 · 14th of 351 · median town $20,524
State land eligible for PILOT is the Division of Local Services’ count of state-owned acres on which the state pays a payment in lieu of taxes; the payment follows the land’s assessed value, not its acreage, so the per-acre figure is a comparison, not the formula. The state-owned share on the land-area tile above is the MassGIS map of all state-owned open space, a wider count. New growth is the assessed value of new construction and improvements added to the tax base, summed FY2017–FY2025 and divided by 2020–24 residents; taxed at the prior year’s rates, it adds to the levy limit beyond 2.5%.
Costs and the 2½% limit
State aid covered 44.6% of Mount Washington’s general-fund spending in FY2025, up from 23.5% in FY2006.
State aid as a share of general-fund spending
FY2006
23.5%
$115,000 of $486,000 · median town 14.1%
FY2016
52.4%
$346,000 of $660,000 · median town 12.2%
FY2025
44.6%
$414,000 of $927,000 · median town 11.5%
Net of state charges, FY2025
44.6%
FY2010: 30.1% · median town 10.0%
State aid is the gross cherry sheet as entered on the tax rate recap; spending is the town’s general-fund expenditures as filed with the Division of Local Services. Net subtracts the charges the state assesses on the same cherry sheet (charter and school-choice tuition, transit, county and other assessments), itemized from FY2010.
Gross state aid went from $115,000 in FY2006 to $414,000 in FY2025, +261.4% in dollars. Consumer prices are the Boston-area CPI-U, up 55.1% over those years; government prices are the federal price index for state and local government purchases, up 74.5%. Fiscal-year averages.
Fixed costs against the 2½% limit, FY2016–FY2025
Health insurance, FY2016–25
−11.8%
$54,000 to $48,000 · all towns +54.0%
All fixed costs, FY2016–25
+5.1%
$97,000 to $102,000 · all towns +53.0%
Years squeezed
2 of 9
fixed costs grew faster than allowed levy growth
Health insurance
2 of 9
years it grew faster than allowed levy growth
Nine years at 2.5% add 24.9%. Grown that way from FY2016, Mount Washington’s health insurance would have been $67,000 in FY2025; it was $48,000, $20,000 below the path. Its fixed costs would have been $121,000 in FY2025; it was $102,000, $19,000 below the path.
Fixed costs are employee benefits, retirement, insurance and similar costs in the general fund; health insurance comes from a separate DLS report. Allowed levy growth is 2.5% plus new growth, as a share of the prior year’s levy limit; a year counts as squeezed when fixed costs grew by a larger percentage.
Flag: health insurance changed by more than 30% in one year in FY2017 (+34%). Swings this size usually mark costs moving between budget lines, into or out of trust funds, or into the state’s Group Insurance Commission, so the comparison may reflect accounting as well as cost.
Local earmarks against the health-insurance increase
Mount Washington’s reported health insurance fell from $54,000 in FY2016 to $48,000 in FY2025, so there is no increase to set its earmarks against.
| Measure | Earmarks | Share of the increase | All towns, pooled |
|---|---|---|---|
| Names the town | $0 | no increase | 28.2% |
| Placed in the town | $0 | no increase | 42.3% |
| Everything placed | $0 | no increase | 45.2% |
An earmark is a one-year appropriation; a health-insurance increase recurs in every later budget. Earmarks are counted on the three measures and are not adjusted for the January 2024 mid-year cuts or the FY2026 hold. All towns: pooled over the towns that reported health insurance in both years. All dollars nominal. Method.
Schools
Mount Washington’s required school contribution is 0.4% of median household income, the third-lowest of 351.
Chapter 70 aid, FY2026
$14,000
attributed to the town
Required local contribution
$42,000
FY2026
Share of household income
0.4%
349th of 351 (1 = highest)
Real aid per pupil, FY2017–26
−56%
after inflation
Mount Washington operates no schools. DESE carries it as a non-operating district, and its pupils attend schools in other districts. Mount Washington had five resident pupils in FY2026, so per-pupil changes swing from year to year.
Real figures use the CPI-U, fiscal-year average, in FY2026 dollars. The required contribution is the local share the state sets under the Chapter 70 formula; the share of income divides it per household by the town’s median household income.
Expected and actual
Mount Washington received $1.2 million in earmarks placed in the town and competitive grants over ten years, 77% of the $1.6 million its size, need and institutions predict.
The expectation comes from a statewide model of all 351 municipalities that uses population, road miles, jobs, poverty, income, tax base, school-aid share and the presence of hospitals, colleges and nonprofits. Those factors explain about 55–60% of the differences between towns. The model leaves out many legitimate reasons a town may receive more or less, such as a single large project, so a gap is a starting point for questions, not a finding about anyone’s conduct.
Earmarks here are placed in the town, the second of three measures (enacted); competitive grants are Comptroller payments (paid). Method.
Peers
Mount Washington is one of eight municipalities, among itself and its ten nearest peers, with no earmarks placed in them in the ten budgets.
Peers are the ten municipalities nearest to Mount Washington on population, income need and tax-base need. The best and lowest performers are the highest and lowest on earmark dollars placed in the town per resident in the wider class of 30 nearest, the second of three measures.
| Municipality | Fairness Index | Formula aid per resident | Competitive per resident | Earmarks placed in the town, per resident (enacted) | Burden index | School contribution, share of income |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mount Washingtonthis town | 62 | $22,393 | $6,365 | $0 | 1.07 | 0.4% |
| Tyringhampeer · lowest in class of 30 | 34 | $4,388 | $85.59 | $0 | 0.28 | 1.0% |
| Alfordpeer | 43 | $5,565 | $1,817 | $0 | 0.13 | 0.9% |
| Aquinnahpeer | 38 | $6,830 | $786 | $150 | 2.09 | 1.9% |
| Montereypeer | 67 | $11,798 | $7,628 | $0 | 3.68 | 1.8% |
| Gosnoldpeer | 82 | $32,727 | $214,090 | $0 | 0.76 | not available |
| New Marlboroughpeer | 49 | $8,719 | $3,098 | $0 | 2.06 | 2.0% |
| Chilmarkpeer | 33 | $5,153 | $334 | $0 | 0.74 | 1.4% |
| Otispeer | 43 | $6,679 | $2,109 | $0 | 1.01 | 2.2% |
| Truropeer | 56 | $7,537 | $7,483 | $130 | 1.62 | 1.6% |
| West Tisburypeer | 52 | $11,333 | $312 | $14.61 | 0.59 | 2.5% |
| Princetonbest in class of 30 | 39 | $8,727 | $417 | $299 | 0.96 | 2.3% |
Formula aid per resident is the ten-year gross total; competitive grants are ten-year totals paid, FY2017–FY2026; earmarks are enacted clauses placed in the town over the same ten budgets. Add up to ten towns to the table; adding needs JavaScript.
Sources
Every figure traces to a public record.
Fairness Index
Representation
State money
What the town carries
- MassDOT Chapter 90 apportionment and Road Inventory
- FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2025
- MassDOT Bridges layer (GeoDOT)
- North Atlantic Aquatic Connectivity Collaborative, road-stream crossings
- DCR Office of Dam Safety inventory, via MassGIS
- American Community Survey housing tables, U.S. Census Bureau
- State grant award lists (Community One Stop, MVP, Green Communities and others)
- DLS Databank, state-owned land eligible for PILOT
- DLS Databank, new growth
Costs and the 2½% limit
- DLS Databank, Schedule A general fund expenditures and revenues
- DLS Databank, health insurance expenditures
- DLS Databank, revenue by source (state aid)
- DLS Databank, cherry sheet receipts and charges by program
- DLS Databank, new growth and levy limits
- Boston-area CPI-U (BLS) and state-local price index (BEA), via FRED
Every figure on this page is built by script from these public sources. Method and limits.
Parcenomics helps towns turn numbers like these into a plan. Municipal services · Contact