Commonwealth Report Legislators Method

Senate · Republican

Richard J. Ross

Former member, served 2015–2018 in the sessions covered here · Norfolk, Bristol and Middlesex

Data through FY2026; built October 19, 2026.

Residence

Wrentham

First elected

House 2004; Senate 2010 (special)

Prior public offices

Wrentham Historical Commission (1974-2003), Wrentham Conservation Commission (1977-'78); Wrentham Refuse Disposal Commission (1977-'78), Wrentham Board of Health (1979-'80); Veteran's Agent (1981-'82), Burial Agent for the Board of Health (1981-2004) ;Mass. House (2005-2010)

Occupation

Business Owner/Funeral Director - R. J. Ross Funeral Home

Left office

defeated in the 2018 general election; term ended January 2, 2019

Seats held, General Courts 189–194 (the FY2017–FY2026 budgets)
SessionChamberDistrictLinesNote
189th (2015–16)SenateNorfolk, Bristol and Middlesex2011 lines
190th (2017–18)SenateNorfolk, Bristol and Middlesex2011 lines

Posts and stipends

Richard J. Ross was paid $45,000 in leadership and committee stipends from 2016 to 2018.

Posts and stipends by session (stipends by calendar year)
SessionPostsFirst yearSecond year
189th (2015–16)Assistant Minority Leadernot available$15,000
190th (2017–18)Assistant Minority Leader$15,000$15,000

Posts: the Legislature’s leadership and roster records as compiled for this project; where those name no post, the member’s committee chair, vice-chair and ranking roles from the Legislature’s member profiles. Stipends: additional compensation in the Comptroller’s payroll data (CTHRU dataset 9ttk-7vz6), 2016–2026; 2026 is the year to date. Stipends for 2015 are not available. Base salary is not included.

The district

Norfolk, Bristol and Middlesex on its 2011 lines: 12 cities and towns, 173,626 residents (2020).

North Attleborough · Franklin · Attleboro · Needham · Natick · Wayland · Wrentham · Norfolk · Wellesley · Plainville · Millis · Sherborn

Percentages are each place’s share of the district’s 2020 residents; for a town split between districts, the share of the town inside this one follows.

Population-weighted Fairness Index of the district’s cities and towns: 39 for all state aid and 30 for discretionary money (50 is a fair share).

Local earmarks are counted three ways. District money uses the first, clauses that name a place in the district; the second table adds organizations located in the district (placed in the district) and state facilities located there (everything placed). Three ways to count a local earmark.

District money, first measure: enacted earmarks in clauses naming a place in the district, by session (district money, not the member’s)
SessionDistrictDollarsIn corrective clausesPer resident per budget, rankWithout corrective clauses, rank
189th (2015–16)Norfolk, Bristol and Middlesex$662,000$0$3.81 · 13th of 40$3.81 · 13th of 40
190th (2017–18)Norfolk, Bristol and Middlesex$1.6M$16,000$4.66 · 14th of 40$4.61 · 14th of 40

District money is where enacted earmarks land, by the place a clause names, mapped to districts by 2020 population; it is not attributed to the member and does not include leadership’s base-text money that names no place. Ranks are of district money per resident among the chamber’s districts, 1 = most. “In corrective clauses” is the part carried by a Ways and Means chair’s corrective amendments, which is leadership’s money; the last column gives the per-resident figure and rank without it. Sessions are labeled by the General Court that enacted each budget. Per-resident figures use the district as drawn for each session (2011 lines through the 192nd General Court, 2021 lines from the 193rd), so they will not equal a session’s dollars divided by the resident count above.

The same district on the other two measures, by session (enacted; includes any corrective-clause money)
SessionDistrictPlaced in the districtPer resident per budget, rankEverything placedPer resident per budget, rank
189th (2015–16)Norfolk, Bristol and Middlesex$662,000$3.81 · 23rd of 40$662,000$3.81 · 24th of 40
190th (2017–18)Norfolk, Bristol and Middlesex$1.6M$4.66 · 21st of 40$1.6M$4.66 · 24th of 40

Budget amendments

Richard J. Ross sponsored 115 budget amendments in FY2017–FY2026, asking for $36.1 million in all.

Amendments sponsored

115

FY2017–FY2026 budgets

Adopted, known outcomes

30%

34 of 115

Chamber rate, same ask sizes

49%

expected at the chamber’s rates

Of the 115 with a known outcome, 34 were adopted (30%). At the chamber’s adoption rate for amendments of the same size, about 56 (49%) would have been.

Largest enacted items matched to an amendment Richard J. Ross filed (strong text matches)
YearAmountEnacted budget text (excerpt)Amendment
FY2019$200,000“improvements to the King street memorial park in the city known as the town of Franklin”S4 #898
FY2017$150,000“mitigation costs in the Millis public school district”S4 #233
FY2017$125,000“improvements to the H. Olive Day School in the town of Norfolk”S4 #221
FY2019$100,000“as mitigation amongst the cities and towns hosting a developmental center, referred to as a “state school” under chapter 19B of the General Laws”S4 #433
FY2018$100,000“repairs and replacement of the roof of the H. Olive Day elementary school in the town of Norfolk”S3 #209

Strong matches: 18 enacted items, $1.2 million (the member’s share where several amendments claim one clause). A further one weaker text match is not listed; attribution is inferred from amendment text and is less certain there.

For 5 amendments the sponsor is the first mover named in the amendment text, because the Legislature’s record listed none. Ask size is the larger of the earmark dollars and the line-item change an amendment requests; bands: no dollar amount, under $50,000, $50,000–$250,000, $250,000–$1 million, $1–5 million, $5 million or more. Leadership’s unattributed base-text and corrective-amendment money is never assigned to a member. The comparison describes outcomes; it is not a measure of merit.

Bills sponsored

Richard J. Ross filed 141 bills as lead sponsor in these sessions; 12 were enacted on their own. In completed sessions, 9% of their lead bills were enacted on their own, against chamber medians of 3% to 4% for the same sessions.

Most bills die in every legislature, and many policies pass inside other bills; the chamber median for the same session is the fair comparison.

Bills filed as lead sponsor, by session and outcome
SessionChamberLead billsEnactedFolded into an enacted billSent to studyReported favorably, then diedReported adversely or withdrawnNo actionEnacted rateChamber medianCosponsored
189th (2015–16)Senate587128631312%4%269
190th (2017–18)Senate83506111156%3%415

Enacted bills as lead sponsor

Outcomes are the furthest point each bill reached in the record. “Folded into an enacted bill” means the history names the enacted bill that absorbed it. “Passed both branches; no chapter recorded” means the bill was enacted by both branches and laid before the Governor, with no chapter or veto in the history; in the 194th General Court such bills are shown as laid before the Governor (pending). The 194th General Court is in session until January 2027, so its open bills are pending, not dead, and its rates (*) are not comparable with completed sessions. Chairs and leaders control the calendar, which raises their rates. Source: malegislature.gov bill histories.

Recorded votes on accountability measures

Richard J. Ross cast eight yes-or-no votes on the eight accountability roll calls in this file (six yes, two no).

Roll calls on rules, audits, public records, term limits and pay
DateMeasureVoteChamber result
January 26, 2017Senate engrossment of the pay-raise billNoYeas 31, nays 9
February 2, 2017Amendment 2.0 (Bruce E. Tarr): Matters considered in an informal sessionYesYeas 38, nays 0
February 2, 2017Amendment 3.0 (Bruce E. Tarr): Time to consider matters in an informalYesYeas 39, nays 0
February 2, 2017Amendment 7.0 (Bruce E. Tarr): Provided with text of bills prior to pollYesYeas 39, nays 0
February 2, 2017Special orders by majority instead of two-thirds (contested meaning)YesYeas 6, nays 33
February 2, 2017Amendment 11.0 (Bruce E. Tarr): Unanimous consentYesYeas 6, nays 33
February 2, 2017Amendment 13.0 (Bruce E. Tarr): Timely Local Aid NotificationYesYeas 7, nays 32
February 2, 2017Senate override of the veto of the pay-raise billNoYeas 31, nays 9

Votes marked “contested meaning” are rules-package and public-records passage votes; reform advocates were on both sides of them. Descriptions are the project’s plain summaries of each question, or the question as recorded for rules-package roll calls; the official record is on malegislature.gov. Votes are facts; no score is computed.

Campaign money in

Richard J. Ross’s committee reported $27,000 in contributions of $250 or more in years the member served, 2015–2018.

By year (years in the Legislature)
YearContributions
2015$4,150
2016$4,900
2017$3,000
2018$14,000
By kind of contributor
KindTotalShare
Individuals$20,00074%
Political committees and PACs$6,80026%
Individuals’ money by the employer they reported
Employer reportedShare
A named employer58%
Self-employed13%
Retired10%
Not employed15%
Not reported or withheld4%

Not counted as contributions: $8,080 in other receipts of $250 or more in the same years (candidate loans and the candidate’s own money, transfers, refunds, bank interest and aggregated small receipts).

Largest employers and organizations
Employer or organizationKindTotalContributions
MA & NORTHERN NE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL POL ACTION COMMcommittee or PAC$2,0004
HORSE N CARRIAGE RESTAURANTindividuals, by employer$1,0001
PROFESSIONAL FIRE FIGHTERS OF MA PEOPLE'S CTTEEcommittee or PAC$1,0002
COMM OF MASSACHUSETTSindividuals, by employer$1,0001
COVE HILL PARTNERSindividuals, by employer$1,0001
DIGITAL ALLOYSindividuals, by employer$1,0001
FINEPOINT CAPITALindividuals, by employer$1,0001
HERRICKindividuals, by employer$1,0001
LAZAREX CANCER FOUNDATIONindividuals, by employer$1,0001
MA CORRECTION OFFICERS FEDERATED UNION PAC M C O F U PACcommittee or PAC$9002

Source: Office of Campaign and Political Finance, itemized receipts of $250 or more since 2015; OCPF filer record: Ross Committee (CPF 14234). Individuals are grouped by the employer they reported; no individual contributor is named, and an employer field that is a person’s name is withheld. Massachusetts bars business contributions to candidates. Employer shows affiliation, not instruction.

Sources

Every figure traces to a public record.

Facts only: posts, stipends, sponsored amendments, enacted items, roll-call votes and district money. No score or grade is computed. Associations shown here are not evidence of cause. Method.