Commonwealth Report Legislators Method

House · Democrat

Peter Capano

Former member, served 2019–2024 in the sessions covered here · 11th Essex

Data through FY2026; built October 19, 2026.

Residence

Lynn

First elected

House 2018

Left office

did not seek reelection in 2024 (not a candidate in the 2024 primary or general election for this seat); term ended January 1, 2025

Seats held, General Courts 189–194 (the FY2017–FY2026 budgets)
SessionChamberDistrictLinesNote
191st (2019–20)House11th Essex2011 lines
192nd (2021–22)House11th Essex2011 lines
193rd (2023–24)House11th Essex2021 lines

Posts and stipends

Peter Capano was paid $26,007 in leadership and committee stipends from 2021 to 2024.

Posts and stipends by session (stipends by calendar year)
SessionPostsFirst yearSecond year
191st (2019–20)No post recorded$0$0
192nd (2021–22)Vice chair, Joint Committee on Veterans and Federal Affairs$5,908$5,908
193rd (2023–24)Vice chair, Joint Committee on Veterans and Federal Affairs$7,096$7,096

Posts: the Legislature’s leadership and roster records as compiled for this project; where those name no post, the member’s committee chair, vice-chair and ranking roles from the Legislature’s member profiles. Stipends: additional compensation in the Comptroller’s payroll data (CTHRU dataset 9ttk-7vz6), 2016–2026; 2026 is the year to date. Stipends for 2015 are not available. Base salary is not included.

The district

11th Essex on its 2021 lines: 2 cities and towns, 46,082 residents (2020).

Lynn · Nahant

Percentages are each place’s share of the district’s 2020 residents; for a town split between districts, the share of the town inside this one follows.

Population-weighted Fairness Index of the district’s cities and towns: 70 for all state aid and 48 for discretionary money (50 is a fair share).

Local earmarks are counted three ways. District money uses the first, clauses that name a place in the district; the second table adds organizations located in the district (placed in the district) and state facilities located there (everything placed). Three ways to count a local earmark.

District money, first measure: enacted earmarks in clauses naming a place in the district, by session (district money, not the member’s)
SessionDistrictDollarsIn corrective clausesPer resident per budget, rankWithout corrective clauses, rank
191st (2019–20)11th Essex$977,000$0$11.27 · 6th of 160$11.27 · 6th of 160
192nd (2021–22)11th Essex$1.7M$0$19.23 · 8th of 160$19.23 · 6th of 160
193rd (2023–24)11th Essex$1.6M$0$17.38 · 23rd of 160$17.38 · 23rd of 160

District money is where enacted earmarks land, by the place a clause names, mapped to districts by 2020 population; it is not attributed to the member and does not include leadership’s base-text money that names no place. Ranks are of district money per resident among the chamber’s districts, 1 = most. “In corrective clauses” is the part carried by a Ways and Means chair’s corrective amendments, which is leadership’s money; the last column gives the per-resident figure and rank without it. Sessions are labeled by the General Court that enacted each budget. Per-resident figures use the district as drawn for each session (2011 lines through the 192nd General Court, 2021 lines from the 193rd), so they will not equal a session’s dollars divided by the resident count above.

The same district on the other two measures, by session (enacted; includes any corrective-clause money)
SessionDistrictPlaced in the districtPer resident per budget, rankEverything placedPer resident per budget, rank
191st (2019–20)11th Essex$574,000$6.62 · 53rd of 160$1.1M$12.31 · 18th of 160
192nd (2021–22)11th Essex$1.7M$19.72 · 15th of 160$2.2M$25.41 · 13th of 160
193rd (2023–24)11th Essex$1.6M$17.38 · 35th of 160$2.1M$22.84 · 29th of 160

Budget amendments

Peter Capano sponsored 37 budget amendments in FY2017–FY2026, asking for $2.8 million in all.

Amendments sponsored

37

FY2017–FY2026 budgets

Adopted, known outcomes

47%

15 of 32

Chamber rate, same ask sizes

65%

expected at the chamber’s rates

Of the 32 with a known outcome, 15 were adopted (47%). At the chamber’s adoption rate for amendments of the same size, about 21 (65%) would have been.

Largest enacted items matched to an amendment Peter Capano filed (strong text matches)
YearAmountEnacted budget text (excerpt)Amendment
FY2025$175,000“Self Esteem Boston Educational Institute, Inc. direct service and provider training programs”H4600 #743
FY2024$100,000“the e-team machinist program in Lynn”H3900 #309
FY2025$50,000“the E-Team Machinist Training Program in the city of Lynn”H4600 #640
FY2025$50,000“a public works utility vehicle for the maintenance of the Nahant Greenlawn cemetery and public park land in Nahant”H4600 #644
FY2023$50,000“repairs to the town of Nahant's council on aging facilities”H4700 #188

Strong matches: 6 enacted items, $450,000 (the member’s share where several amendments claim one clause). A further one weaker text match is not listed; attribution is inferred from amendment text and is less certain there. House attribution is inferred throughout, because the House adopts most amendments inside consolidated amendments.

29 outcomes are inferred by matching amendment text to the House’s consolidated amendments, because the House records most amendments only as “Consolidated A–G.” Ask size is the larger of the earmark dollars and the line-item change an amendment requests; bands: no dollar amount, under $50,000, $50,000–$250,000, $250,000–$1 million, $1–5 million, $5 million or more. Leadership’s unattributed base-text and corrective-amendment money is never assigned to a member. The comparison describes outcomes; it is not a measure of merit.

Bills sponsored

Peter Capano filed 55 bills as lead sponsor in these sessions; three were enacted on their own. In completed sessions, 5% of their lead bills were enacted on their own, against chamber medians of 3% to 4% for the same sessions.

Most bills die in every legislature, and many policies pass inside other bills; the chamber median for the same session is the fair comparison.

Bills filed as lead sponsor, by session and outcome
SessionChamberLead billsEnactedSent to studyReported favorably, then diedNo actionEnacted rateChamber medianCosponsored
191st (2019–20)House19396116%4%322
192nd (2021–22)House17010610%3%334
193rd (2023–24)House19012610%4%149

Enacted bills as lead sponsor

Outcomes are the furthest point each bill reached in the record. “Folded into an enacted bill” means the history names the enacted bill that absorbed it. “Passed both branches; no chapter recorded” means the bill was enacted by both branches and laid before the Governor, with no chapter or veto in the history; in the 194th General Court such bills are shown as laid before the Governor (pending). The 194th General Court is in session until January 2027, so its open bills are pending, not dead, and its rates (*) are not comparable with completed sessions. Chairs and leaders control the calendar, which raises their rates. Source: malegislature.gov bill histories.

Recorded votes on accountability measures

Peter Capano cast 21 yes-or-no votes on the 46 accountability roll calls in this file (five yes, 16 no); recorded as not voting on 25.

Roll calls on rules, audits, public records, term limits and pay
DateMeasureVoteChamber result
January 30, 2019Amendment 1.0 (Jonathan Hecht): Time to review billsNot votingYeas 55, nays 103
January 30, 2019Amendment 2.0 (Jonathan Hecht): Time to review amendmentsNot votingYeas 47, nays 111
January 30, 2019Amendment 3.0 (Jonathan Hecht): Committee materials and votesNot votingYeas 49, nays 109
January 30, 2019Collective bargaining for House employees (curb on leadership control of staff); not a disclosure/power-of-leadership rule in the narrow sense (contested meaning)Not votingYeas 9, nays 149
January 30, 2019Amendment 11.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Access to InformationNot votingYeas 40, nays 118
January 30, 2019Amendment 12.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Emergency Scheduling of HearingsNot votingYeas 35, nays 123
January 30, 2019Amendment 14.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Committee Polls – 2 HoursNot votingYeas 44, nays 114
January 30, 2019Amendment 16.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): House AuditsNot votingYeas 35, nays 123
January 30, 2019Amendment 17.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): HWM Reports on BillsNot votingYeas 33, nays 125
January 30, 2019Amendment 19.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Local Aid ResolutionNot votingYeas 32, nays 126
January 30, 2019Amendment 20.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Review of Consolidated AmendmentsNot votingYeas 32, nays 125
January 30, 2019Amendment 22.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Committee Votes on WebsiteNot votingYeas 44, nays 113
January 30, 2019Fingerprint remote voting from committee rooms (contested meaning)Not votingYeas 32, nays 125
January 30, 2019Amendment 25.0 (Marc T. Lombardo): Matters considered in an informal sessionNot votingYeas 32, nays 125
January 30, 2019Amendment 31.0 (John H. Rogers): Relative to Rule 18CNot votingYeas 43, nays 113
January 30, 2019Amendment 32.0 (Patrick Joseph Kearney): relative to Rule 100 ( c ) 3Not votingYeas 5, nays 152
January 30, 2019Amendment 33.0 (Patrick Joseph Kearney): relative to Rule 20A and Rule 33ANot votingYeas 5, nays 152
January 30, 2019Equitable office space (leadership allocates offices) (contested meaning)Not votingYeas 11, nays 146
January 30, 2019Amendment 38.0 (Denise Provost): To assure adequate time to prepare and file amendmentsNot votingYeas 44, nays 113
January 30, 2019Amendment 41.0 (Russell E. Holmes): Equal Pay Amendment IINot votingYeas 5, nays 152
January 30, 2019House rules (H2019), rules package: on adoption of the order (contested meaning)Not votingYeas 125, nays 32
January 30, 2019Conference-committee appointment deadline; adopted 157-0 (contested meaning)Not votingYeas 157, nays 0
January 30, 2019Amendment 11.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Committee Roll Calls on WebsiteNot votingYeas 47, nays 110
January 30, 2019Amendment 12.0 (Marc T. Lombardo): Informal SessionNot votingYeas 36, nays 121
January 30, 2019Joint rules (H2021), rules package: on adoption of the order (contested meaning)Not votingYeas 157, nays 0
February 24, 2021Amendment 8.0 (Erika Uyterhoeven): Public Committee Votes and TestimonyNoYeas 36, nays 122
February 24, 2021Amendment 3.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Electronic PollNoYeas 38, nays 121
February 24, 2021Amendment 6.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Procurement AmendmentNoYeas 34, nays 125
February 24, 2021Amendment 11.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Conference Committee ReportNoYeas 35, nays 123
February 24, 2021Joint rules (H68), rules package: on adoption of the Order (contested meaning)YesYeas 128, nays 31
July 7, 2021Remote voting for members on military duty; adopted 160-0 (contested meaning)YesYeas 160, nays 0
July 7, 2021Amendment 2.0 (Tami L. Gouveia): Speaker Term LimitsNoYeas 35, nays 125
July 7, 2021Amendment 6.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Emergency Scheduling of HearingsNoYeas 30, nays 129
July 7, 2021Amendment 9.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Committee Polls - 2 HoursNoYeas 35, nays 124
July 7, 2021Amendment 11.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Access to InformationNoYeas 33, nays 126
July 7, 2021Amendment 13.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Review of Consolidated AmendmentsNoYeas 32, nays 127
July 7, 2021Amendment 12.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Committee Votes on WebsiteNoYeas 38, nays 121
July 7, 2021Amendment 16.0 (Erika Uyterhoeven): Public Committee VotesNoYeas 41, nays 117
July 7, 2021Amendment 3.0 (Christopher M. Markey): Review Period for Released BillsNoYeas 39, nays 119
July 7, 2021House rules (H3930), rules package: on adoption of the order (contested meaning)YesYeas 129, nays 29
February 1, 2023Amendment 7.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Time to review technical/ perfecting amendmentsNoYeas 23, nays 130
February 1, 2023Amendment 12.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Review of Consolidated AmendmentsNoYeas 23, nays 130
February 1, 2023House rules (H2023), rules package: on adoption of the order (contested meaning)YesYeas 153, nays 0
February 1, 2023Amendment 3.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Local Aid ResolutionNoYeas 23, nays 130
February 1, 2023Amendment 9.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Hearing ScheduleNoYeas 24, nays 129
February 1, 2023Joint rules (H2025), rules package: on adoption of the order (contested meaning)YesYeas 153, nays 0

Votes marked “contested meaning” are rules-package and public-records passage votes; reform advocates were on both sides of them. Descriptions are the project’s plain summaries of each question, or the question as recorded for rules-package roll calls; the official record is on malegislature.gov. Votes are facts; no score is computed.

Campaign money in

Peter Capano’s committee reported $29,000 in contributions of $250 or more in years the member served, 2019–2023.

By year (years in the Legislature)
YearContributions
2019$13,000
2020$2,000
2021$4,530
2022$6,850
2023$2,500
By kind of contributor
KindTotalShare
Unions and associations$21,00074%
Individuals$4,99517%
Political committees and PACs$2,6009%
Individuals’ money by the employer they reported
Employer reportedShare
A named employer40%
Self-employed55%
Not reported or withheld5%

Not counted as contributions: $4,934 in other receipts of $250 or more in the same years (candidate loans and the candidate’s own money, transfers, refunds, bank interest and aggregated small receipts).

The same committee also reported $41,000 in years the member was not in the Legislature (2015, 2017, 2018), for example while running for another office. Those receipts are not in the totals above.

Largest employers and organizations
Employer or organizationKindTotalContributions
CWA -COPE PCCunion or association$2,0001
MA & NO NEW ENGLAND LABORERS DISTRICT COUNCIL---- CPF ID80479union or association$2,0004
COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICAunion or association$2,0001
CARPENTERS LOCAL 339 CPF 80991union or association$1,5004
SEIU 1199 80769union or association$1,5003
617 MEDIAindividuals, by employer$1,0001
IRONWORKERS LOCAL 7 CPF80219union or association$1,0002
MASS BRICKLAYERS PEOPLES COMMITTEE 80323union or association$1,0002
PAINTERS DISTRICT COUNCIL GENERAL CHECKING 2union or association$1,0001
SPRINKLER FITTERS LOCAL 550union or association$1,0002

Source: Office of Campaign and Political Finance, itemized receipts of $250 or more since 2015; OCPF filer record: Capano Committee (CPF 15977). Individuals are grouped by the employer they reported; no individual contributor is named, and an employer field that is a person’s name is withheld. Massachusetts bars business contributions to candidates. Employer shows affiliation, not instruction.

Sources

Every figure traces to a public record.

Facts only: posts, stipends, sponsored amendments, enacted items, roll-call votes and district money. No score or grade is computed. Associations shown here are not evidence of cause. Method.