Commonwealth Report Legislators Method

House · Republican

Norman J. Orrall

Current member · 12th Bristol

Data through FY2026; built October 19, 2026.

Residence

Lakeville

First elected

House 2018

Seats held, General Courts 189–194 (the FY2017–FY2026 budgets)
SessionChamberDistrictLinesNote
191st (2019–20)House12th Bristol2011 lines
192nd (2021–22)House12th Bristol2011 lines
193rd (2023–24)House12th Bristol2021 lines
194th (2025–26)House12th Bristol2021 lines

Posts and stipends

Norman J. Orrall was paid $39,877 in leadership and committee stipends from 2025 to 2026 (2026 to date).

Posts and stipends by session (stipends by calendar year)
SessionPostsFirst yearSecond year
191st (2019–20)Ranking minority member, Joint Committee on State Administration and Regulatory Oversight$0$0
192nd (2021–22)Ranking minority member, Joint Committee on Environment, Natural Resources and Agriculture$0$0
193rd (2023–24)Ranking minority member, Joint Committee on Environment and Natural Resources; Ranking minority member, Joint Committee on Municipalities and Regional Government$0$0
194th (2025–26)Ranking minority member, Joint Committee on Bonding, Capital Expenditures and State Assets$22,431$17,446 (to date)

Posts: the Legislature’s leadership and roster records as compiled for this project; where those name no post, the member’s committee chair, vice-chair and ranking roles from the Legislature’s member profiles. Stipends: additional compensation in the Comptroller’s payroll data (CTHRU dataset 9ttk-7vz6), 2016–2026; 2026 is the year to date. Stipends for 2015 are not available. Base salary is not included.

The district

12th Bristol on its 2021 lines: 4 cities and towns, 45,261 residents (2020).

Taunton · Middleborough · Lakeville · Berkley

Percentages are each place’s share of the district’s 2020 residents; for a town split between districts, the share of the town inside this one follows.

Population-weighted Fairness Index of the district’s cities and towns: 50 for all state aid and 19 for discretionary money (50 is a fair share).

Local earmarks are counted three ways. District money uses the first, clauses that name a place in the district; the second table adds organizations located in the district (placed in the district) and state facilities located there (everything placed). Three ways to count a local earmark.

District money, first measure: enacted earmarks in clauses naming a place in the district, by session (district money, not the member’s)
SessionDistrictDollarsIn corrective clausesPer resident per budget, rankWithout corrective clauses, rank
191st (2019–20)12th Bristol$232,000$0$2.79 · 108th of 160$2.79 · 108th of 160
192nd (2021–22)12th Bristol$400,000$0$4.81 · 116th of 160$4.81 · 110th of 160
193rd (2023–24)12th Bristol$580,000$0$6.41 · 99th of 160$6.41 · 95th of 160
194th (2025–26)12th Bristol$60,000$0$1.33 · 154th of 160$1.33 · 154th of 160

District money is where enacted earmarks land, by the place a clause names, mapped to districts by 2020 population; it is not attributed to the member and does not include leadership’s base-text money that names no place. Ranks are of district money per resident among the chamber’s districts, 1 = most. “In corrective clauses” is the part carried by a Ways and Means chair’s corrective amendments, which is leadership’s money; the last column gives the per-resident figure and rank without it. Sessions are labeled by the General Court that enacted each budget. Per-resident figures use the district as drawn for each session (2011 lines through the 192nd General Court, 2021 lines from the 193rd), so they will not equal a session’s dollars divided by the resident count above.

The same district on the other two measures, by session (enacted; includes any corrective-clause money)
SessionDistrictPlaced in the districtPer resident per budget, rankEverything placedPer resident per budget, rank
191st (2019–20)12th Bristol$277,000$3.33 · 111th of 160$277,000$3.33 · 114th of 160
192nd (2021–22)12th Bristol$500,000$6.01 · 111th of 160$500,000$6.01 · 116th of 160
193rd (2023–24)12th Bristol$598,000$6.61 · 112th of 160$780,000$8.62 · 88th of 160
194th (2025–26)12th Bristol$160,000$3.54 · 141st of 160$160,000$3.54 · 145th of 160

Budget amendments

Norman J. Orrall sponsored 17 budget amendments in FY2017–FY2026, asking for $97.3 million in all.

Amendments sponsored

17

FY2017–FY2026 budgets

Adopted, known outcomes

69%

11 of 16

Chamber rate, same ask sizes

57%

expected at the chamber’s rates

Of the 16 with a known outcome, 11 were adopted (69%). At the chamber’s adoption rate for amendments of the same size, about nine (57%) would have been.

Largest enacted items matched to an amendment Norman J. Orrall filed (strong text matches)
YearAmountEnacted budget text (excerpt)Amendment
FY2026$100,000“the operation of the Cranberry Health Research Center at the University of Massachusetts at Dartmouth”H4000 #505
FY2024$50,000“the Middleborough parks department for the reconstruction of the Pierce playground”H3900 #1026
FY2024$50,000“the Bristol-Plymouth regional vocational high school for the renovation of its vehicle entrance”H3900 #1027
FY2020$35,000“improvement to the Nemasket River by the Middleborough-Lakeville Herring Fishery Commission”H3800 #47
FY2023$30,000“sediment removal in the upper Nemasket river from Assawompset pond to Wareham street, including the Assawompset pond dam”H4700 #815

Strong matches: 10 enacted items, $390,000 (the member’s share where several amendments claim one clause). House attribution is inferred throughout, because the House adopts most amendments inside consolidated amendments.

14 outcomes are inferred by matching amendment text to the House’s consolidated amendments, because the House records most amendments only as “Consolidated A–G.” Ask size is the larger of the earmark dollars and the line-item change an amendment requests; bands: no dollar amount, under $50,000, $50,000–$250,000, $250,000–$1 million, $1–5 million, $5 million or more. Leadership’s unattributed base-text and corrective-amendment money is never assigned to a member. The comparison describes outcomes; it is not a measure of merit.

Bills sponsored

Norman J. Orrall filed 28 bills as lead sponsor in these sessions; four were enacted on their own. In completed sessions, 14% of their lead bills were enacted on their own, against chamber medians of 3% to 4% for the same sessions.

Most bills die in every legislature, and many policies pass inside other bills; the chamber median for the same session is the fair comparison.

Bills filed as lead sponsor, by session and outcome
SessionChamberLead billsEnactedSent to studyReported favorably, then diedNo actionPending (session open)Enacted rateChamber medianCosponsored
191st (2019–20)House6050100%4%145
192nd (2021–22)House7052000%3%147
193rd (2023–24)House83320038%4%47
194th (2025–26)House71400214%*1%69

Enacted bills as lead sponsor

Outcomes are the furthest point each bill reached in the record. “Folded into an enacted bill” means the history names the enacted bill that absorbed it. “Passed both branches; no chapter recorded” means the bill was enacted by both branches and laid before the Governor, with no chapter or veto in the history; in the 194th General Court such bills are shown as laid before the Governor (pending). The 194th General Court is in session until January 2027, so its open bills are pending, not dead, and its rates (*) are not comparable with completed sessions. Chairs and leaders control the calendar, which raises their rates. Source: malegislature.gov bill histories.

Recorded votes on accountability measures

Norman J. Orrall cast 60 yes-or-no votes on the 60 accountability roll calls in this file (49 yes, 11 no).

Roll calls on rules, audits, public records, term limits and pay
DateMeasureVoteChamber result
January 30, 2019Amendment 1.0 (Jonathan Hecht): Time to review billsYesYeas 55, nays 103
January 30, 2019Amendment 2.0 (Jonathan Hecht): Time to review amendmentsYesYeas 47, nays 111
January 30, 2019Amendment 3.0 (Jonathan Hecht): Committee materials and votesYesYeas 49, nays 109
January 30, 2019Collective bargaining for House employees (curb on leadership control of staff); not a disclosure/power-of-leadership rule in the narrow sense (contested meaning)NoYeas 9, nays 149
January 30, 2019Amendment 11.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Access to InformationYesYeas 40, nays 118
January 30, 2019Amendment 12.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Emergency Scheduling of HearingsYesYeas 35, nays 123
January 30, 2019Amendment 14.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Committee Polls – 2 HoursYesYeas 44, nays 114
January 30, 2019Amendment 16.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): House AuditsYesYeas 35, nays 123
January 30, 2019Amendment 17.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): HWM Reports on BillsYesYeas 33, nays 125
January 30, 2019Amendment 19.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Local Aid ResolutionYesYeas 32, nays 126
January 30, 2019Amendment 20.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Review of Consolidated AmendmentsYesYeas 32, nays 125
January 30, 2019Amendment 22.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Committee Votes on WebsiteYesYeas 44, nays 113
January 30, 2019Fingerprint remote voting from committee rooms (contested meaning)YesYeas 32, nays 125
January 30, 2019Amendment 25.0 (Marc T. Lombardo): Matters considered in an informal sessionYesYeas 32, nays 125
January 30, 2019Amendment 31.0 (John H. Rogers): Relative to Rule 18CYesYeas 43, nays 113
January 30, 2019Amendment 32.0 (Patrick Joseph Kearney): relative to Rule 100 ( c ) 3NoYeas 5, nays 152
January 30, 2019Amendment 33.0 (Patrick Joseph Kearney): relative to Rule 20A and Rule 33ANoYeas 5, nays 152
January 30, 2019Equitable office space (leadership allocates offices) (contested meaning)NoYeas 11, nays 146
January 30, 2019Amendment 38.0 (Denise Provost): To assure adequate time to prepare and file amendmentsYesYeas 44, nays 113
January 30, 2019Amendment 41.0 (Russell E. Holmes): Equal Pay Amendment IINoYeas 5, nays 152
January 30, 2019House rules (H2019), rules package: on adoption of the order (contested meaning)NoYeas 125, nays 32
January 30, 2019Conference-committee appointment deadline; adopted 157-0 (contested meaning)YesYeas 157, nays 0
January 30, 2019Amendment 11.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Committee Roll Calls on WebsiteYesYeas 47, nays 110
January 30, 2019Amendment 12.0 (Marc T. Lombardo): Informal SessionYesYeas 36, nays 121
January 30, 2019Joint rules (H2021), rules package: on adoption of the order (contested meaning)YesYeas 157, nays 0
February 24, 2021Amendment 8.0 (Erika Uyterhoeven): Public Committee Votes and TestimonyYesYeas 36, nays 122
February 24, 2021Amendment 3.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Electronic PollYesYeas 38, nays 121
February 24, 2021Amendment 6.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Procurement AmendmentYesYeas 34, nays 125
February 24, 2021Amendment 11.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Conference Committee ReportYesYeas 35, nays 123
February 24, 2021Joint rules (H68), rules package: on adoption of the Order (contested meaning)NoYeas 128, nays 31
July 7, 2021Remote voting for members on military duty; adopted 160-0 (contested meaning)YesYeas 160, nays 0
July 7, 2021Amendment 2.0 (Tami L. Gouveia): Speaker Term LimitsYesYeas 35, nays 125
July 7, 2021Amendment 6.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Emergency Scheduling of HearingsYesYeas 30, nays 129
July 7, 2021Amendment 9.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Committee Polls - 2 HoursYesYeas 35, nays 124
July 7, 2021Amendment 11.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Access to InformationYesYeas 33, nays 126
July 7, 2021Amendment 13.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Review of Consolidated AmendmentsYesYeas 32, nays 127
July 7, 2021Amendment 12.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Committee Votes on WebsiteYesYeas 38, nays 121
July 7, 2021Amendment 16.0 (Erika Uyterhoeven): Public Committee VotesYesYeas 41, nays 117
July 7, 2021Amendment 3.0 (Christopher M. Markey): Review Period for Released BillsYesYeas 39, nays 119
July 7, 2021House rules (H3930), rules package: on adoption of the order (contested meaning)NoYeas 129, nays 29
February 1, 2023Amendment 7.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Time to review technical/ perfecting amendmentsYesYeas 23, nays 130
February 1, 2023Amendment 12.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Review of Consolidated AmendmentsYesYeas 23, nays 130
February 1, 2023House rules (H2023), rules package: on adoption of the order (contested meaning)YesYeas 153, nays 0
February 1, 2023Amendment 3.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Local Aid ResolutionYesYeas 23, nays 130
February 1, 2023Amendment 9.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Hearing ScheduleYesYeas 24, nays 129
February 1, 2023Joint rules (H2025), rules package: on adoption of the order (contested meaning)YesYeas 153, nays 0
February 25, 2025Amendment 2.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Roll CallsYesYeas 23, nays 128
February 25, 2025Amendment 3.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Formal Session NotificationYesYeas 23, nays 128
February 25, 2025Amendment 4.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): General Court AuditsYesYeas 23, nays 128
February 25, 2025Amendment 5.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Opinion of the JusticesYesYeas 23, nays 128
February 25, 2025Amendment 6.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Committee PollsYesYeas 23, nays 128
February 25, 2025Amendment 7.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Committee Poll NotificationYesYeas 23, nays 128
February 25, 2025Joint rules (H2026), rules package: on adoption of the order (contested meaning)NoYeas 128, nays 23
February 25, 2025Amendment 18.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Time to Review LegislationYesYeas 23, nays 128
February 25, 2025Amendment 17.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Audit by State AuditorYesYeas 24, nays 127
February 25, 2025Amendment 2.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Committee PollsYesYeas 23, nays 128
February 25, 2025Amendment 3.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Committee Poll NotificationsYesYeas 23, nays 128
February 25, 2025House rules (H2024), rules package: on adoption of the order (contested meaning)NoYeas 128, nays 23
June 26, 2025Joint rules (conference report) (S2545), rules package: on acceptance (contested meaning)YesYeas 147, nays 2
June 3, 2026Engross H.5469 (public records law applied to the Legislature). Reform advocates split (contested meaning)NoYeas 125, nays 28

Votes marked “contested meaning” are rules-package and public-records passage votes; reform advocates were on both sides of them. Descriptions are the project’s plain summaries of each question, or the question as recorded for rules-package roll calls; the official record is on malegislature.gov. Votes are facts; no score is computed.

Campaign money in

Norman J. Orrall’s committee reported $10,000 in contributions of $250 or more in years the member served, 2019–2026.

By year (years in the Legislature)
YearContributions
2019$2,250
2020$3,500
2021$500
2022$500
2023$500
2024$1,050
2025$1,250
2026$500
By kind of contributor
KindTotalShare
Individuals$5,80058%
Political committees and PACs$3,00030%
Unions and associations$1,25012%
Individuals’ money by the employer they reported
Employer reportedShare
A named employer61%
Self-employed30%
Retired9%

Not counted as contributions: $525 in other receipts of $250 or more in the same years (candidate loans and the candidate’s own money, transfers, refunds, bank interest and aggregated small receipts).

The same committee also reported $29,000 in years the member was not in the Legislature (2018), for example while running for another office. Those receipts are not in the totals above.

Largest employers and organizations
Employer or organizationKindTotalContributions
MA & NO NEW ENGLAND LABORER'S DISTRICT COUNCILcommittee or PAC$1,2503
STILES AND HART BRICKindividuals, by employer$8002
SWORD AND SPOON ENTERPRISESindividuals, by employer$7502
MA & NO NEW ENGLAND LABORER'S DISTRICT COUNCILunion or association$7502
CONSOLIDATED PLUMBINGindividuals, by employer$5002
LOBSTER TRAPindividuals, by employer$5002
BAYSTATE FINANCIALindividuals, by employer$5001
MA & NORTHERN NE LABORERS DISTRICT COUNCIL POL ACTION COMMITTEEcommittee or PAC$5001
MASSACHUSETTS ORGANIZATION OF STATE ENGINEERS & SCIENTISTSunion or association$5002
MA & NORTHERN NE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCILcommittee or PAC$5001

Source: Office of Campaign and Political Finance, itemized receipts of $250 or more since 2015; OCPF filer record: Orrall Committee (CPF 16927). Individuals are grouped by the employer they reported; no individual contributor is named, and an employer field that is a person’s name is withheld. Massachusetts bars business contributions to candidates. Employer shows affiliation, not instruction.

Sources

Every figure traces to a public record.

Facts only: posts, stipends, sponsored amendments, enacted items, roll-call votes and district money. No score or grade is computed. Associations shown here are not evidence of cause. Method.