House · Democrat
Michael P. Kushmerek
Data through FY2026; built October 19, 2026.
Residence
Fitchburg
First elected
House 2020
Prior public offices
Fitchburg City Council President 2016-2020; Fitchburg City Councilor: 2014-2021; Fitchburg Municipal Airport Commission: 2016-2021; Fitchburg Capital Improvement Commission: 2016-2021
Occupation
Higher Education Administration & Development
| Session | Chamber | District | Lines | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 192nd (2021–22) | House | 3rd Worcester | 2011 lines | |
| 193rd (2023–24) | House | 3rd Worcester | 2021 lines | |
| 194th (2025–26) | House | 3rd Worcester | 2021 lines |
Posts and stipends
Michael P. Kushmerek was paid $54,069 in leadership and committee stipends from 2023 to 2026 (2026 to date).
| Session | Posts | First year | Second year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 192nd (2021–22) | No post recorded | $0 | $0 |
| 193rd (2023–24) | Vice chair, Joint Committee on Tourism, Arts and Cultural Development | $7,096 | $7,096 |
| 194th (2025–26) | Vice chair, Joint Committee on Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy | $22,431 | $17,446 (to date) |
Posts: the Legislature’s leadership and roster records as compiled for this project; where those name no post, the member’s committee chair, vice-chair and ranking roles from the Legislature’s member profiles. Stipends: additional compensation in the Comptroller’s payroll data (CTHRU dataset 9ttk-7vz6), 2016–2026; 2026 is the year to date. Stipends for 2015 are not available. Base salary is not included.
The district
3rd Worcester on its 2021 lines: 2 cities and towns, 44,935 residents (2020).
Percentages are each place’s share of the district’s 2020 residents; for a town split between districts, the share of the town inside this one follows.
Population-weighted Fairness Index of the district’s cities and towns: 66 for all state aid and 71 for discretionary money (50 is a fair share).
Local earmarks are counted three ways. District money uses the first, clauses that name a place in the district; the second table adds organizations located in the district (placed in the district) and state facilities located there (everything placed). Three ways to count a local earmark.
| Session | District | Dollars | In corrective clauses | Per resident per budget, rank | Without corrective clauses, rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 192nd (2021–22) | 3rd Worcester | $590,000 | $0 | $6.56 · 79th of 160 | $6.56 · 76th of 160 |
| 193rd (2023–24) | 3rd Worcester | $2.2M | $0 | $25.02 · 8th of 160 | $25.02 · 8th of 160 |
| 194th (2025–26) | 3rd Worcester | $1.4M | $0 | $31.97 · 8th of 160 | $31.97 · 8th of 160 |
District money is where enacted earmarks land, by the place a clause names, mapped to districts by 2020 population; it is not attributed to the member and does not include leadership’s base-text money that names no place. Ranks are of district money per resident among the chamber’s districts, 1 = most. “In corrective clauses” is the part carried by a Ways and Means chair’s corrective amendments, which is leadership’s money; the last column gives the per-resident figure and rank without it. Sessions are labeled by the General Court that enacted each budget. Per-resident figures use the district as drawn for each session (2011 lines through the 192nd General Court, 2021 lines from the 193rd), so they will not equal a session’s dollars divided by the resident count above.
| Session | District | Placed in the district | Per resident per budget, rank | Everything placed | Per resident per budget, rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 192nd (2021–22) | 3rd Worcester | $610,000 | $6.79 · 94th of 160 | $610,000 | $6.79 · 96th of 160 |
| 193rd (2023–24) | 3rd Worcester | $2.4M | $27.03 · 21st of 160 | $2.4M | $27.03 · 22nd of 160 |
| 194th (2025–26) | 3rd Worcester | $1.2M | $27.52 · 18th of 160 | $5.3M | $118 · 4th of 160 |
Budget amendments
Michael P. Kushmerek sponsored 33 budget amendments in FY2017–FY2026, asking for $32.9 million in all.
Amendments sponsored
33
FY2017–FY2026 budgets
Adopted, known outcomes
78%
21 of 27
Chamber rate, same ask sizes
62%
expected at the chamber’s rates
Of the 27 with a known outcome, 21 were adopted (78%). At the chamber’s adoption rate for amendments of the same size, about 17 (62%) would have been.
| Year | Amount | Enacted budget text (excerpt) | Amendment |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2026 | $250,000 (shared two ways) | “enhance the commonwealth's capacity to support the development of school-based bridge programs for youth who have had prolonged absence due to…” | H4000 #778 |
| FY2026 | $125,000 (shared two ways) | “Thrive Scholars to support college to career services” | H4000 #727 |
| FY2025 | $125,000 (shared two ways) | “the city of Fitchburg for downtown housing development and site improvement” | H4600 #302 |
| FY2024 | $100,000 | “the NewVue Communities, Inc., a community development corporation in the city of Fitchburg, for the redevelopment and historic preservation of the…” | H3900 #173 |
| FY2026 | $50,000 | “the Fitchburg public library for the development and expansion of the children’s program room” | H4000 #733 |
Strong matches: 16 enacted items, $990,000 (the member’s share where several amendments claim one clause). House attribution is inferred throughout, because the House adopts most amendments inside consolidated amendments.
27 outcomes are inferred by matching amendment text to the House’s consolidated amendments, because the House records most amendments only as “Consolidated A–G.” Ask size is the larger of the earmark dollars and the line-item change an amendment requests; bands: no dollar amount, under $50,000, $50,000–$250,000, $250,000–$1 million, $1–5 million, $5 million or more. Leadership’s unattributed base-text and corrective-amendment money is never assigned to a member. The comparison describes outcomes; it is not a measure of merit.
Bills sponsored
Michael P. Kushmerek filed 77 bills as lead sponsor in these sessions; two were enacted on their own. In completed sessions, 5% of their lead bills were enacted on their own, against chamber medians of 3% to 4% for the same sessions.
Most bills die in every legislature, and many policies pass inside other bills; the chamber median for the same session is the fair comparison.
| Session | Chamber | Lead bills | Enacted | Folded into an enacted bill | Sent to study | Reported favorably, then died | Reported adversely or withdrawn | No action | Pending (session open) | Enacted rate | Chamber median | Cosponsored |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 192nd (2021–22) | House | 10 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 3% | 226 |
| 193rd (2023–24) | House | 30 | 2 | 1 | 16 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 7% | 4% | 191 |
| 194th (2025–26) | House | 37 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 0%* | 1% | 148 |
Enacted bills as lead sponsor
- H3075 (193rd): An Act relative to Rosa Parks Day · Chapter 371 of the Acts of 2024
- H3864 (193rd): An Act relating to the regular compensation of certain active and retired employees of the city of Fitchburg · Chapter 377 of the Acts of 2024
Outcomes are the furthest point each bill reached in the record. “Folded into an enacted bill” means the history names the enacted bill that absorbed it. “Passed both branches; no chapter recorded” means the bill was enacted by both branches and laid before the Governor, with no chapter or veto in the history; in the 194th General Court such bills are shown as laid before the Governor (pending). The 194th General Court is in session until January 2027, so its open bills are pending, not dead, and its rates (*) are not comparable with completed sessions. Chairs and leaders control the calendar, which raises their rates. Source: malegislature.gov bill histories.
Recorded votes on accountability measures
Michael P. Kushmerek cast 35 yes-or-no votes on the 35 accountability roll calls in this file (nine yes, 26 no).
| Date | Measure | Vote | Chamber result |
|---|---|---|---|
| February 24, 2021 | Amendment 8.0 (Erika Uyterhoeven): Public Committee Votes and Testimony | No | Yeas 36, nays 122 |
| February 24, 2021 | Amendment 3.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Electronic Poll | No | Yeas 38, nays 121 |
| February 24, 2021 | Amendment 6.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Procurement Amendment | No | Yeas 34, nays 125 |
| February 24, 2021 | Amendment 11.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Conference Committee Report | No | Yeas 35, nays 123 |
| February 24, 2021 | Joint rules (H68), rules package: on adoption of the Order (contested meaning) | Yes | Yeas 128, nays 31 |
| July 7, 2021 | Remote voting for members on military duty; adopted 160-0 (contested meaning) | Yes | Yeas 160, nays 0 |
| July 7, 2021 | Amendment 2.0 (Tami L. Gouveia): Speaker Term Limits | No | Yeas 35, nays 125 |
| July 7, 2021 | Amendment 6.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Emergency Scheduling of Hearings | No | Yeas 30, nays 129 |
| July 7, 2021 | Amendment 9.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Committee Polls - 2 Hours | No | Yeas 35, nays 124 |
| July 7, 2021 | Amendment 11.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Access to Information | No | Yeas 33, nays 126 |
| July 7, 2021 | Amendment 13.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Review of Consolidated Amendments | No | Yeas 32, nays 127 |
| July 7, 2021 | Amendment 12.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Committee Votes on Website | No | Yeas 38, nays 121 |
| July 7, 2021 | Amendment 16.0 (Erika Uyterhoeven): Public Committee Votes | No | Yeas 41, nays 117 |
| July 7, 2021 | Amendment 3.0 (Christopher M. Markey): Review Period for Released Bills | No | Yeas 39, nays 119 |
| July 7, 2021 | House rules (H3930), rules package: on adoption of the order (contested meaning) | Yes | Yeas 129, nays 29 |
| February 1, 2023 | Amendment 7.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Time to review technical/ perfecting amendments | No | Yeas 23, nays 130 |
| February 1, 2023 | Amendment 12.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Review of Consolidated Amendments | No | Yeas 23, nays 130 |
| February 1, 2023 | House rules (H2023), rules package: on adoption of the order (contested meaning) | Yes | Yeas 153, nays 0 |
| February 1, 2023 | Amendment 3.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Local Aid Resolution | No | Yeas 23, nays 130 |
| February 1, 2023 | Amendment 9.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Hearing Schedule | No | Yeas 24, nays 129 |
| February 1, 2023 | Joint rules (H2025), rules package: on adoption of the order (contested meaning) | Yes | Yeas 153, nays 0 |
| February 25, 2025 | Amendment 2.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Roll Calls | No | Yeas 23, nays 128 |
| February 25, 2025 | Amendment 3.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Formal Session Notification | No | Yeas 23, nays 128 |
| February 25, 2025 | Amendment 4.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): General Court Audits | No | Yeas 23, nays 128 |
| February 25, 2025 | Amendment 5.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Opinion of the Justices | No | Yeas 23, nays 128 |
| February 25, 2025 | Amendment 6.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Committee Polls | No | Yeas 23, nays 128 |
| February 25, 2025 | Amendment 7.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Committee Poll Notification | No | Yeas 23, nays 128 |
| February 25, 2025 | Joint rules (H2026), rules package: on adoption of the order (contested meaning) | Yes | Yeas 128, nays 23 |
| February 25, 2025 | Amendment 18.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Time to Review Legislation | No | Yeas 23, nays 128 |
| February 25, 2025 | Amendment 17.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Audit by State Auditor | No | Yeas 24, nays 127 |
| February 25, 2025 | Amendment 2.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Committee Polls | No | Yeas 23, nays 128 |
| February 25, 2025 | Amendment 3.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Committee Poll Notifications | No | Yeas 23, nays 128 |
| February 25, 2025 | House rules (H2024), rules package: on adoption of the order (contested meaning) | Yes | Yeas 128, nays 23 |
| June 26, 2025 | Joint rules (conference report) (S2545), rules package: on acceptance (contested meaning) | Yes | Yeas 147, nays 2 |
| June 3, 2026 | Engross H.5469 (public records law applied to the Legislature). Reform advocates split (contested meaning) | Yes | Yeas 125, nays 28 |
Votes marked “contested meaning” are rules-package and public-records passage votes; reform advocates were on both sides of them. Descriptions are the project’s plain summaries of each question, or the question as recorded for rules-package roll calls; the official record is on malegislature.gov. Votes are facts; no score is computed.
Campaign money in
Michael P. Kushmerek’s committee reported $101,000 in contributions of $250 or more in years the member served, 2021–2026.
| Year | Contributions |
|---|---|
| 2021 | $9,650 |
| 2022 | $36,000 |
| 2023 | $11,000 |
| 2024 | $16,000 |
| 2025 | $18,000 |
| 2026 | $9,900 |
| Kind | Total | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Individuals | $48,000 | 48% |
| Political committees and PACs | $44,000 | 44% |
| Unions and associations | $8,850 | 9% |
| Employer reported | Share |
|---|---|
| A named employer | 57% |
| Self-employed | 24% |
| Retired | 7% |
| Not employed | 7% |
| Not reported or withheld | 5% |
Not counted as contributions: $2,263 in other receipts of $250 or more in the same years (candidate loans and the candidate’s own money, transfers, refunds, bank interest and aggregated small receipts).
The same committee also reported $27,000 in years the member was not in the Legislature (2017, 2019, 2020), for example while running for another office. Those receipts are not in the totals above.
| Employer or organization | Kind | Total | Contributions |
|---|---|---|---|
| MA DEMOCRATIC STATE COMMITTEE | committee or PAC | $12,000 | 6 |
| RESUPPLY | individuals, by employer | $5,000 | 5 |
| MODERNA | individuals, by employer | $4,500 | 6 |
| MA & NORTHERN NE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL POL ACTION COMM | committee or PAC | $3,000 | 6 |
| NORTH ATLANTIC STATES REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PAC | committee or PAC | $3,000 | 6 |
| RETIRED PUBLIC EMPLOYEES PAC | committee or PAC | $2,800 | 6 |
| MASSACHUSETTS BRICK LAYERS PEOPLE'S COMMITTEE | committee or PAC | $2,500 | 5 |
| PROFESSIONAL FIRE FIGHTERS OF MA POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE | committee or PAC | $2,500 | 5 |
| DARIOS GROUP | individuals, by employer | $2,250 | 6 |
| MA CORRECTION OFFICERS FEDERATED UNION PAC M C O F U PAC | committee or PAC | $2,200 | 6 |
Source: Office of Campaign and Political Finance, itemized receipts of $250 or more since 2015; OCPF filer record: Kushmerek Committee (CPF 16838). Individuals are grouped by the employer they reported; no individual contributor is named, and an employer field that is a person’s name is withheld. Massachusetts bars business contributions to candidates. Employer shows affiliation, not instruction.
Sources
Every figure traces to a public record.
- Massachusetts Legislature, members, districts and roll calls
- Budget amendments and enacted budgets, FY2017–FY2026
- CTHRU payroll, Office of the Comptroller (stipends)
- Office of Campaign and Political Finance
- District lines: Acts of 2011 and 2021; Census 2020 block populations
- Official profile (prior offices, occupation)
- Election statistics (first elected, residence)
Facts only: posts, stipends, sponsored amendments, enacted items, roll-call votes and district money. No score or grade is computed. Associations shown here are not evidence of cause. Method.