Commonwealth Report Legislators Method

Senate · Republican

Kelly A. Dooner

Current member · Third Bristol and Plymouth

Data through FY2026; built October 19, 2026.

Residence

Taunton

First elected

Senate 2024

Seats held, General Courts 189–194 (the FY2017–FY2026 budgets)
SessionChamberDistrictLinesNote
194th (2025–26)SenateThird Bristol and Plymouth2021 lines

Posts and stipends

Kelly A. Dooner was paid $93,047 in leadership and committee stipends from 2025 to 2026 (2026 to date).

Posts and stipends by session (stipends by calendar year)
SessionPostsFirst yearSecond year
194th (2025–26)Assistant Minority Leader; Ranking Minority Member on Senate Intergovernmental Affairs, Joint Health Care Financing and 6 other joint committees$52,339$40,708 (to date)

Posts: the Legislature’s leadership and roster records as compiled for this project; where those name no post, the member’s committee chair, vice-chair and ranking roles from the Legislature’s member profiles. Stipends: additional compensation in the Comptroller’s payroll data (CTHRU dataset 9ttk-7vz6), 2016–2026; 2026 is the year to date. Stipends for 2015 are not available. Base salary is not included.

The district

Third Bristol and Plymouth on its 2021 lines: 10 cities and towns, 181,988 residents (2020).

Taunton · Middleborough · Wareham · Seekonk · Raynham · Rehoboth · Carver · Dighton · Berkley · Marion

Percentages are each place’s share of the district’s 2020 residents; for a town split between districts, the share of the town inside this one follows.

Population-weighted Fairness Index of the district’s cities and towns: 48 for all state aid and 27 for discretionary money (50 is a fair share).

Local earmarks are counted three ways. District money uses the first, clauses that name a place in the district; the second table adds organizations located in the district (placed in the district) and state facilities located there (everything placed). Three ways to count a local earmark.

District money, first measure: enacted earmarks in clauses naming a place in the district, by session (district money, not the member’s)
SessionDistrictDollarsIn corrective clausesPer resident per budget, rankWithout corrective clauses, rank
194th (2025–26)Third Bristol and Plymouth$115,000$0$0.63 · 40th of 40$0.63 · 40th of 40

District money is where enacted earmarks land, by the place a clause names, mapped to districts by 2020 population; it is not attributed to the member and does not include leadership’s base-text money that names no place. Ranks are of district money per resident among the chamber’s districts, 1 = most. “In corrective clauses” is the part carried by a Ways and Means chair’s corrective amendments, which is leadership’s money; the last column gives the per-resident figure and rank without it. Sessions are labeled by the General Court that enacted each budget. Per-resident figures use the district as drawn for each session (2011 lines through the 192nd General Court, 2021 lines from the 193rd), so they will not equal a session’s dollars divided by the resident count above.

The same district on the other two measures, by session (enacted; includes any corrective-clause money)
SessionDistrictPlaced in the districtPer resident per budget, rankEverything placedPer resident per budget, rank
194th (2025–26)Third Bristol and Plymouth$590,000$3.24 · 39th of 40$590,000$3.24 · 39th of 40

Budget amendments

Kelly A. Dooner sponsored 44 budget amendments in FY2017–FY2026, asking for $1.3 million in all.

Amendments sponsored

44

FY2017–FY2026 budgets

Adopted, known outcomes

18%

8 of 44

Chamber rate, same ask sizes

36%

expected at the chamber’s rates

Of the 44 with a known outcome, eight were adopted (18%). At the chamber’s adoption rate for amendments of the same size, about 16 (36%) would have been.

Largest enacted items matched to an amendment Kelly A. Dooner filed (strong text matches)
YearAmountEnacted budget text (excerpt)Amendment
FY2026$15,000“the police department of the town of Seekonk for the purchase of body-worn cameras”S3 #927

Strong matches: 1 enacted item, $15,000 (the member’s share where several amendments claim one clause).

Ask size is the larger of the earmark dollars and the line-item change an amendment requests; bands: no dollar amount, under $50,000, $50,000–$250,000, $250,000–$1 million, $1–5 million, $5 million or more. Leadership’s unattributed base-text and corrective-amendment money is never assigned to a member. The comparison describes outcomes; it is not a measure of merit.

Bills sponsored

Kelly A. Dooner filed 44 bills as lead sponsor in these sessions; five were enacted on their own. Only the 194th General Court, still in session, is covered, so no enacted rate is given.

Most bills die in every legislature, and many policies pass inside other bills; the chamber median for the same session is the fair comparison.

Bills filed as lead sponsor, by session and outcome
SessionChamberLead billsEnactedFolded into an enacted billSent to studyPending (session open)Enacted rateChamber medianCosponsored
194th (2025–26)Senate4452211611%*1%37

Enacted bills as lead sponsor

Outcomes are the furthest point each bill reached in the record. “Folded into an enacted bill” means the history names the enacted bill that absorbed it. “Passed both branches; no chapter recorded” means the bill was enacted by both branches and laid before the Governor, with no chapter or veto in the history; in the 194th General Court such bills are shown as laid before the Governor (pending). The 194th General Court is in session until January 2027, so its open bills are pending, not dead, and its rates (*) are not comparable with completed sessions. Chairs and leaders control the calendar, which raises their rates. Source: malegislature.gov bill histories.

Recorded votes on accountability measures

Kelly A. Dooner cast 20 yes-or-no votes on the 21 accountability roll calls in this file (18 yes, two no, one for a named candidate).

Roll calls on rules, audits, public records, term limits and pay
DateMeasureVoteChamber result
not availableSenate President election (contested meaning)Voted for Bruce E. Tarrnot available
February 12, 2025Amendment 2.0 (Bruce E. Tarr): Number of bills to be heardYesYeas 5, nays 33
February 12, 2025Amendment 9.0 (Bruce E. Tarr): Minority conference committee reportYesYeas 6, nays 32
February 12, 2025Amendment 10.0 (Bruce E. Tarr): 48 Hours for conference committee reportsYesYeas 5, nays 33
February 12, 2025Amendment 13.0 (Bruce E. Tarr): Timeline for review of conference committee reportsYesYeas 6, nays 32
February 12, 2025Amendment 22.0 (John F. Keenan): Considering Conference ReportsYesYeas 9, nays 29
February 12, 2025Amendment 26.0 (John F. Keenan): Preventing Unjustified Financial Gain for Members and Their FamilesYesYeas 38, nays 0
February 12, 2025Amendment 29.0 (John F. Keenan): Limiting Joint Committee ExtensionsYesYeas 6, nays 32
not availableJoint rules (S15), rules package: question on passing the bill to be engrossed (contested meaning)YesYeas 39, nays 0
February 13, 2025In-person voting conditions (contested meaning)YesYeas 5, nays 32
February 13, 2025Amendment 36.0 (John F. Keenan): Continuing Beyond MidnightYesYeas 6, nays 31
February 13, 2025Shorten period in which a matter can be laid on the table (dilatory motions) (contested meaning)YesYeas 5, nays 33
February 13, 2025Amendment 10.0 (Bruce E. Tarr): Going past 10PMYesYeas 6, nays 32
February 13, 2025Amendment 19.0 (Ryan C. Fattman): Virtual vote designationYesYeas 6, nays 31
February 13, 2025Legislative days for Rule 24 (dilatory motions) (contested meaning)YesYeas 6, nays 32
February 13, 2025Senate rules (S19), rules package: question on acceptance of the report (contested meaning)YesYeas 39, nays 0
June 26, 2025Joint rules (conference report) (S2545), rules package: question on acceptance of conference committee report (contested meaning)YesYeas 40, nays 0
May 28, 2026S.3104 resolutions limiting the Senate's response to the Auditor to the SJC-defined 4 requests; no votes 5 Republicans + Montigny; contested (contested meaning)NoYeas 33, nays 6
July 30, 2026Press shield amendment to S.3200; adopted 40-0; not about the Legislature's records (contested meaning)YesYeas 40, nays 0
July 30, 2026Amd 18 (Tarr): apply the public records law to the General Court more fullyYesYeas 6, nays 33
July 30, 2026Senate passage of H.5469 34-6; no votes 5 Republicans + Montigny (too weak); contested (contested meaning)NoYeas 34, nays 6

Votes marked “contested meaning” are rules-package and public-records passage votes; reform advocates were on both sides of them. Descriptions are the project’s plain summaries of each question, or the question as recorded for rules-package roll calls; the official record is on malegislature.gov. Votes are facts; no score is computed.

Campaign money in

Kelly A. Dooner’s committee reported $31,000 in contributions of $250 or more in years the member served, 2025–2026.

By year (years in the Legislature)
YearContributions
2025$21,000
2026$10,000
By kind of contributor
KindTotalShare
Individuals$29,00093%
Political committees and PACs$2,1507%
Individuals’ money by the employer they reported
Employer reportedShare
A named employer31%
Self-employed34%
Retired23%
Not reported or withheld11%

Not counted as contributions: $250 in other receipts of $250 or more in the same years (candidate loans and the candidate’s own money, transfers, refunds, bank interest and aggregated small receipts).

The same committee also reported $85,000 in years the member was not in the Legislature (2020, 2024), for example while running for another office. Those receipts are not in the totals above.

Largest employers and organizations
Employer or organizationKindTotalContributions
WES CONSTRUCTIONindividuals, by employer$1,5002
MA & NORTHERN NE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL POL ACTION COMMcommittee or PAC$1,0002
BGCBindividuals, by employer$1,0001
M33 GROWTHindividuals, by employer$1,0001
STILES AND HART BRICKindividuals, by employer$1,0002
TOWN OF DENNISindividuals, by employer$1,0002
BROWNSTONE REALTY GROUPindividuals, by employer$7502
AGTindividuals, by employer$5202
REHOBOTH REPUBLICAN TOWN COMMITTEEcommittee or PAC$5001
BELCO FUELindividuals, by employer$5002

Source: Office of Campaign and Political Finance, itemized receipts of $250 or more since 2015; OCPF filer record: Dooner Committee (CPF 17425). Individuals are grouped by the employer they reported; no individual contributor is named, and an employer field that is a person’s name is withheld. Massachusetts bars business contributions to candidates. Employer shows affiliation, not instruction.

Sources

Every figure traces to a public record.

Facts only: posts, stipends, sponsored amendments, enacted items, roll-call votes and district money. No score or grade is computed. Associations shown here are not evidence of cause. Method.