Commonwealth Report Legislators Method

House · Republican

Kate D. Campanale

Former member, served 2015–2018 in the sessions covered here · 17th Worcester

Data through FY2026; built October 19, 2026.

Residence

Leicester

First elected

House 2014

Left office

did not seek reelection in 2018 (not a candidate in the 2018 primary or general election for this seat); term ended January 2, 2019

Seats held, General Courts 189–194 (the FY2017–FY2026 budgets)
SessionChamberDistrictLinesNote
189th (2015–16)House17th Worcester2011 lines
190th (2017–18)House17th Worcester2011 lines

Posts and stipends

No stipend payments to Kate D. Campanale are recorded for 2016–2026.

Posts and stipends by session (stipends by calendar year)
SessionPostsFirst yearSecond year
189th (2015–16)No post recordednot available$0
190th (2017–18)No post recorded$0$0

Posts: the Legislature’s leadership and roster records as compiled for this project; where those name no post, the member’s committee chair, vice-chair and ranking roles from the Legislature’s member profiles. Stipends: additional compensation in the Comptroller’s payroll data (CTHRU dataset 9ttk-7vz6), 2016–2026; 2026 is the year to date. Stipends for 2015 are not available. Base salary is not included.

The district

17th Worcester on its 2011 lines: 2 cities and towns, 43,466 residents (2020).

Worcester · Leicester

Percentages are each place’s share of the district’s 2020 residents; for a town split between districts, the share of the town inside this one follows.

Population-weighted Fairness Index of the district’s cities and towns: 62 for all state aid and 57 for discretionary money (50 is a fair share).

Local earmarks are counted three ways. District money uses the first, clauses that name a place in the district; the second table adds organizations located in the district (placed in the district) and state facilities located there (everything placed). Three ways to count a local earmark.

District money, first measure: enacted earmarks in clauses naming a place in the district, by session (district money, not the member’s)
SessionDistrictDollarsIn corrective clausesPer resident per budget, rankWithout corrective clauses, rank
189th (2015–16)17th Worcester$85,000$16,000$1.97 · 104th of 160$1.61 · 111th of 160
190th (2017–18)17th Worcester$325,000$0$3.74 · 92nd of 160$3.74 · 89th of 160

District money is where enacted earmarks land, by the place a clause names, mapped to districts by 2020 population; it is not attributed to the member and does not include leadership’s base-text money that names no place. Ranks are of district money per resident among the chamber’s districts, 1 = most. “In corrective clauses” is the part carried by a Ways and Means chair’s corrective amendments, which is leadership’s money; the last column gives the per-resident figure and rank without it. Sessions are labeled by the General Court that enacted each budget. Per-resident figures use the district as drawn for each session (2011 lines through the 192nd General Court, 2021 lines from the 193rd), so they will not equal a session’s dollars divided by the resident count above.

The same district on the other two measures, by session (enacted; includes any corrective-clause money)
SessionDistrictPlaced in the districtPer resident per budget, rankEverything placedPer resident per budget, rank
189th (2015–16)17th Worcester$132,000$3.05 · 88th of 160$132,000$3.05 · 90th of 160
190th (2017–18)17th Worcester$479,000$5.51 · 64th of 160$479,000$5.51 · 69th of 160

Budget amendments

Kate D. Campanale sponsored 14 budget amendments in FY2017–FY2026, asking for $6.3 million in all.

Amendments sponsored

14

FY2017–FY2026 budgets

Adopted, known outcomes

30%

3 of 10

Chamber rate, same ask sizes

54%

expected at the chamber’s rates

Of the ten with a known outcome, three were adopted (30%). At the chamber’s adoption rate for amendments of the same size, about five (54%) would have been.

Largest enacted items matched to an amendment Kate D. Campanale filed (strong text matches)
YearAmountEnacted budget text (excerpt)Amendment
FY2017$25,000 (shared two ways)“the continued maintenance of chemical treatments, dredging and water chestnut removal at Coes pond and Representative John J. Binienda memorial beach…”H4200 #349

Strong matches: 1 enacted item, $25,000 (the member’s share where several amendments claim one clause). A further two weaker text matches are not listed; attribution is inferred from amendment text and is less certain there. House attribution is inferred throughout, because the House adopts most amendments inside consolidated amendments.

8 outcomes are inferred by matching amendment text to the House’s consolidated amendments, because the House records most amendments only as “Consolidated A–G.” Ask size is the larger of the earmark dollars and the line-item change an amendment requests; bands: no dollar amount, under $50,000, $50,000–$250,000, $250,000–$1 million, $1–5 million, $5 million or more. Leadership’s unattributed base-text and corrective-amendment money is never assigned to a member. The comparison describes outcomes; it is not a measure of merit.

Bills sponsored

Kate D. Campanale filed 14 bills as lead sponsor in these sessions; one was enacted on its own. In completed sessions, 7% of their lead bills were enacted on their own, against chamber medians of 6% to 7% for the same sessions.

Most bills die in every legislature, and many policies pass inside other bills; the chamber median for the same session is the fair comparison.

Bills filed as lead sponsor, by session and outcome
SessionChamberLead billsEnactedSent to studyReported favorably, then diedEnacted rateChamber medianCosponsored
189th (2015–16)House80620%6%37
190th (2017–18)House613217%7%109

Enacted bills as lead sponsor

Outcomes are the furthest point each bill reached in the record. “Folded into an enacted bill” means the history names the enacted bill that absorbed it. “Passed both branches; no chapter recorded” means the bill was enacted by both branches and laid before the Governor, with no chapter or veto in the history; in the 194th General Court such bills are shown as laid before the Governor (pending). The 194th General Court is in session until January 2027, so its open bills are pending, not dead, and its rates (*) are not comparable with completed sessions. Chairs and leaders control the calendar, which raises their rates. Source: malegislature.gov bill histories.

Recorded votes on accountability measures

Kate D. Campanale cast 21 yes-or-no votes on the 21 accountability roll calls in this file (17 yes, four no).

Roll calls on rules, audits, public records, term limits and pay
DateMeasureVoteChamber result
January 25, 2017Recommit the 2017 pay-raise bill (H.58) to Ways and MeansYesYeas 35, nays 125
January 25, 2017Amd 3 (Lyons): legislators' raise not effective until next General CourtYesYeas 40, nays 120
January 25, 2017Amd 5 (Lyons): cap the increases at 4%YesYeas 36, nays 124
January 25, 2017Engrossment of the pay-raise bill (stipend increases)NoYeas 116, nays 44
January 26, 2017Enactment of the pay-raise billNoYeas 116, nays 43
February 2, 2017Override of Gov. Baker's veto of the pay-raise billNoYeas 116, nays 43
February 2, 2017Amendment 1.0 (Geoff Diehl): Text of the proposed House amendment (Representative Diehl) to the House Bill relative to Rank and File (House, No. 2017)YesYeas 34, nays 124
February 2, 2017Sustain the Chair's ruling (point of order, Mr. Mark) against Diehl amd 2, Speaker term limitsNoYeas 123, nays 33
February 2, 2017Amendment 3.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): 24 Hour Time Frame for Bills to Be Acted OnYesYeas 35, nays 124
February 2, 2017Amendment 4.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Access to InformationYesYeas 35, nays 124
February 2, 2017Amendment 9.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Emergency Scheduling of HearingsYesYeas 38, nays 121
February 2, 2017Amendment 10.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Equal Representation on Ethics CommitteeYesYeas 35, nays 124
February 2, 2017Amendment 15.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): InoculatorsYesYeas 37, nays 122
February 2, 2017Amendment 16.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Local Aid ResolutionYesYeas 38, nays 121
February 2, 2017Amendment 27.0 (James J. Lyons, Jr.): Defining and Limiting Informal SessionYesYeas 34, nays 124
February 2, 2017Amendment 20.0 (Shaunna L. O'Connell): Public access to House financial accounts auditsYesYeas 34, nays 125
February 2, 2017Amendment 21.0 (Shaunna L. O'Connell): Public access to committee votesYesYeas 41, nays 118
February 2, 2017Amendment 5.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Local Aid ResolutionYesYeas 37, nays 122
February 2, 2017Amendment 11.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Committee Roll Calls on WebsiteYesYeas 38, nays 121
February 2, 2017Amendment 13.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Reports of Conference Filing DeadlineYesYeas 37, nays 122
February 2, 2017Amendment 14.0 (Shaunna L. O'Connell): Public access to committee votesYesYeas 38, nays 121

Votes marked “contested meaning” are rules-package and public-records passage votes; reform advocates were on both sides of them. Descriptions are the project’s plain summaries of each question, or the question as recorded for rules-package roll calls; the official record is on malegislature.gov. Votes are facts; no score is computed.

Campaign money in

Kate D. Campanale’s committee reported $83,000 in contributions of $250 or more in years the member served, 2015–2018.

By year (years in the Legislature)
YearContributions
2015$13,000
2016$46,000
2017$13,000
2018$11,000
By kind of contributor
KindTotalShare
Individuals$46,00055%
Political committees and PACs$35,00042%
Unions and associations$2,2503%
Individuals’ money by the employer they reported
Employer reportedShare
A named employer25%
Self-employed30%
Retired22%
Homemaker or at home2%
Not reported or withheld21%

Not counted as contributions: $65,000 in other receipts of $250 or more in the same years (candidate loans and the candidate’s own money, transfers, refunds, bank interest and aggregated small receipts).

The same committee also reported $45,000 in years the member was not in the Legislature (2022, 2023), for example while running for another office. Those receipts are not in the totals above.

Largest employers and organizations
Employer or organizationKindTotalContributions
REPUBLICAN STATE COMMITTEEcommittee or PAC$28,0005
MARLBOROUGH REPCCcommittee or PAC$2,0002
MA & NO NEW ENGLAND LABORERS' DISTRICTunion or association$1,5003
TOWN OF LEICESTERindividuals, by employer$1,3032
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTSindividuals, by employer$1,3002
MA STATE POLICEindividuals, by employer$1,2504
MASSACHUSETTS REPUBLICAN PARTYcommittee or PAC$1,0001
NEW MARLBOROUGH REPUBLICAN CITY COMMITTEEcommittee or PAC$1,0001
ENERGY INSULATIONindividuals, by employer$1,0002
ATLAS DISTRIBUTINGindividuals, by employer$1,0004

Source: Office of Campaign and Political Finance, itemized receipts of $250 or more since 2015; OCPF filer record: Campanale Committee (CPF 15815). Individuals are grouped by the employer they reported; no individual contributor is named, and an employer field that is a person’s name is withheld. Massachusetts bars business contributions to candidates. Employer shows affiliation, not instruction.

Sources

Every figure traces to a public record.

Facts only: posts, stipends, sponsored amendments, enacted items, roll-call votes and district money. No score or grade is computed. Associations shown here are not evidence of cause. Method.