Commonwealth Report Legislators Method

House · Democrat

Jeffrey Sánchez

Former member, served 2015–2018 in the sessions covered here · 15th Suffolk

Data through FY2026; built October 19, 2026.

Residence

Boston

First elected

House 2002

Occupation

Legislator

Left office

did not seek reelection in 2018 (not a candidate in the 2018 primary or general election for this seat); term ended January 2, 2019

Seats held, General Courts 189–194 (the FY2017–FY2026 budgets)
SessionChamberDistrictLinesNote
189th (2015–16)House15th Suffolk2011 lines
190th (2017–18)House15th Suffolk2011 lines

Posts and stipends

Jeffrey Sánchez was paid $126,154 in leadership and committee stipends from 2016 to 2018.

Posts and stipends by session (stipends by calendar year)
SessionPostsFirst yearSecond year
189th (2015–16)Chair, Joint Committee on Health Care Financingnot available$15,000
190th (2017–18)W&M Chair (from Jul 2017)$46,154$65,000

Posts: the Legislature’s leadership and roster records as compiled for this project; where those name no post, the member’s committee chair, vice-chair and ranking roles from the Legislature’s member profiles. Stipends: additional compensation in the Comptroller’s payroll data (CTHRU dataset 9ttk-7vz6), 2016–2026; 2026 is the year to date. Stipends for 2015 are not available. Base salary is not included.

The district

15th Suffolk on its 2011 lines: 2 cities and towns, 43,248 residents (2020).

Boston · Brookline

Percentages are each place’s share of the district’s 2020 residents; for a town split between districts, the share of the town inside this one follows.

Population-weighted Fairness Index of the district’s cities and towns: 40 for all state aid and 34 for discretionary money (50 is a fair share).

Local earmarks are counted three ways. District money uses the first, clauses that name a place in the district; the second table adds organizations located in the district (placed in the district) and state facilities located there (everything placed). Three ways to count a local earmark.

District money, first measure: enacted earmarks in clauses naming a place in the district, by session (district money, not the member’s)
SessionDistrictDollarsIn corrective clausesPer resident per budget, rankWithout corrective clauses, rank
189th (2015–16)15th Suffolk$76,000$13,000$1.77 · 109th of 160$1.46 · 117th of 160
190th (2017–18)15th Suffolk$834,000$8,944$9.65 · 8th of 160$9.54 · 8th of 160

District money is where enacted earmarks land, by the place a clause names, mapped to districts by 2020 population; it is not attributed to the member and does not include leadership’s base-text money that names no place. Ranks are of district money per resident among the chamber’s districts, 1 = most. “In corrective clauses” is the part carried by a Ways and Means chair’s corrective amendments, which is leadership’s money; the last column gives the per-resident figure and rank without it. Sessions are labeled by the General Court that enacted each budget. Per-resident figures use the district as drawn for each session (2011 lines through the 192nd General Court, 2021 lines from the 193rd), so they will not equal a session’s dollars divided by the resident count above.

The same district on the other two measures, by session (enacted; includes any corrective-clause money)
SessionDistrictPlaced in the districtPer resident per budget, rankEverything placedPer resident per budget, rank
189th (2015–16)15th Suffolk$124,000$2.86 · 92nd of 160$124,000$2.86 · 93rd of 160
190th (2017–18)15th Suffolk$1.5M$16.86 · 8th of 160$1.5M$16.93 · 9th of 160

Budget amendments

Jeffrey Sánchez sponsored eight budget amendments of their own in FY2017–FY2026, asking for $5.7 million in all.

Amendments sponsored

8

FY2017–FY2026 budgets

Adopted, known outcomes

67%

4 of 6

Chamber rate, same ask sizes

58%

expected at the chamber’s rates

Of the six with a known outcome, four were adopted (67%). At the chamber’s adoption rate for amendments of the same size, about three (58%) would have been.

Filed as Ways and Means chair; leadership corrective amendments: one amendment, with $2.1 million in enacted items matched to them (190th General Court). This is leadership’s money moved through the chair’s amendments; it is not counted in the member’s own amendments or items. Items that name places in the district are included in the district money below.

Largest enacted items matched to an amendment Jeffrey Sánchez filed (strong text matches)
YearAmountEnacted budget text (excerpt)Amendment
FY2017$150,000“the operation of the Behavioral Health and Outpatient Substance Abuse Services to provide counseling and treatment for individuals suffering from…”H4200 #139
FY2018$125,000“a grant to the Hyde Square Task Force”H3600 #690
FY2018$125,000“a grant to the Union of Minority Neighborhoods”H3600 #703
FY2017$125,000“a grant to the Union of Minority Neighborhoods, Inc”H4200 #127

Strong matches: 4 enacted items, $525,000 (the member’s share where several amendments claim one clause). House attribution is inferred throughout, because the House adopts most amendments inside consolidated amendments.

5 outcomes are inferred by matching amendment text to the House’s consolidated amendments, because the House records most amendments only as “Consolidated A–G.” Ask size is the larger of the earmark dollars and the line-item change an amendment requests; bands: no dollar amount, under $50,000, $50,000–$250,000, $250,000–$1 million, $1–5 million, $5 million or more. Leadership’s unattributed base-text and corrective-amendment money is never assigned to a member. The comparison describes outcomes; it is not a measure of merit.

Bills sponsored

Jeffrey Sánchez filed 44 bills as lead sponsor in these sessions; four were enacted on their own. In completed sessions, 9% of their lead bills were enacted on their own, against chamber medians of 6% to 7% for the same sessions.

Most bills die in every legislature, and many policies pass inside other bills; the chamber median for the same session is the fair comparison.

Bills filed as lead sponsor, by session and outcome
SessionChamberLead billsEnactedFolded into an enacted billSent to studyReported favorably, then diedNo actionEnacted rateChamber medianCosponsored
189th (2015–16)House181010616%6%40
190th (2017–18)House2631911212%7%39

Enacted bills as lead sponsor

Outcomes are the furthest point each bill reached in the record. “Folded into an enacted bill” means the history names the enacted bill that absorbed it. “Passed both branches; no chapter recorded” means the bill was enacted by both branches and laid before the Governor, with no chapter or veto in the history; in the 194th General Court such bills are shown as laid before the Governor (pending). The 194th General Court is in session until January 2027, so its open bills are pending, not dead, and its rates (*) are not comparable with completed sessions. Chairs and leaders control the calendar, which raises their rates. Source: malegislature.gov bill histories.

Recorded votes on accountability measures

Jeffrey Sánchez cast 18 yes-or-no votes on the 18 accountability roll calls in this file (one yes, 17 no).

Roll calls on rules, audits, public records, term limits and pay
DateMeasureVoteChamber result
January 25, 2017Recommit the 2017 pay-raise bill (H.58) to Ways and MeansNoYeas 35, nays 125
January 25, 2017Amd 3 (Lyons): legislators' raise not effective until next General CourtNoYeas 40, nays 120
January 25, 2017Amd 5 (Lyons): cap the increases at 4%NoYeas 36, nays 124
January 25, 2017Engrossment of the pay-raise bill (stipend increases)YesYeas 116, nays 44
February 2, 2017Amendment 1.0 (Geoff Diehl): Text of the proposed House amendment (Representative Diehl) to the House Bill relative to Rank and File (House, No. 2017)NoYeas 34, nays 124
February 2, 2017Amendment 3.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): 24 Hour Time Frame for Bills to Be Acted OnNoYeas 35, nays 124
February 2, 2017Amendment 4.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Access to InformationNoYeas 35, nays 124
February 2, 2017Amendment 9.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Emergency Scheduling of HearingsNoYeas 38, nays 121
February 2, 2017Amendment 10.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Equal Representation on Ethics CommitteeNoYeas 35, nays 124
February 2, 2017Amendment 15.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): InoculatorsNoYeas 37, nays 122
February 2, 2017Amendment 16.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Local Aid ResolutionNoYeas 38, nays 121
February 2, 2017Amendment 27.0 (James J. Lyons, Jr.): Defining and Limiting Informal SessionNoYeas 34, nays 124
February 2, 2017Amendment 20.0 (Shaunna L. O'Connell): Public access to House financial accounts auditsNoYeas 34, nays 125
February 2, 2017Amendment 21.0 (Shaunna L. O'Connell): Public access to committee votesNoYeas 41, nays 118
February 2, 2017Amendment 5.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Local Aid ResolutionNoYeas 37, nays 122
February 2, 2017Amendment 11.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Committee Roll Calls on WebsiteNoYeas 38, nays 121
February 2, 2017Amendment 13.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Reports of Conference Filing DeadlineNoYeas 37, nays 122
February 2, 2017Amendment 14.0 (Shaunna L. O'Connell): Public access to committee votesNoYeas 38, nays 121

Votes marked “contested meaning” are rules-package and public-records passage votes; reform advocates were on both sides of them. Descriptions are the project’s plain summaries of each question, or the question as recorded for rules-package roll calls; the official record is on malegislature.gov. Votes are facts; no score is computed.

Campaign money in

Jeffrey Sánchez’s committee reported $293,000 in contributions of $250 or more in years the member served, 2015–2018.

By year (years in the Legislature)
YearContributions
2015$30,000
2016$24,000
2017$66,000
2018$172,000
By kind of contributor
KindTotalShare
Individuals$250,00086%
Political committees and PACs$31,00010%
Unions and associations$12,0004%
Individuals’ money by the employer they reported
Employer reportedShare
A named employer60%
Self-employed20%
Retired5%
Not employed3%
Homemaker or at home6%
Not reported or withheld7%

Not counted as contributions: $11,000 in other receipts of $250 or more in the same years (candidate loans and the candidate’s own money, transfers, refunds, bank interest and aggregated small receipts).

The same committee also reported $1,125 in years the member was not in the Legislature (2019, 2020), for example while running for another office. Those receipts are not in the totals above.

Largest employers and organizations
Employer or organizationKindTotalContributions
BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MASSACHUSETTSindividuals, by employer$7,95018
STAR REALTY GROUPindividuals, by employer$3,5004
SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTIONindividuals, by employer$3,0003
REGIONAL HOME CAREindividuals, by employer$2,5006
GUARDIAN HEALTHCAREindividuals, by employer$2,0002
GLOBAL PARTNERSindividuals, by employer$2,0002
WINGATE HEALTHCAREindividuals, by employer$2,0002
AMCV CONSULTINGindividuals, by employer$2,0003
HORIZON BEVERAGEindividuals, by employer$2,0004
BOSTON CARMEN'S UNION LOCAL 589union or association$2,0001

Source: Office of Campaign and Political Finance, itemized receipts of $250 or more since 2015; OCPF filer record: Sanchez Committee (CPF 13954). Individuals are grouped by the employer they reported; no individual contributor is named, and an employer field that is a person’s name is withheld. Massachusetts bars business contributions to candidates. Employer shows affiliation, not instruction.

Sources

Every figure traces to a public record.

Facts only: posts, stipends, sponsored amendments, enacted items, roll-call votes and district money. No score or grade is computed. Associations shown here are not evidence of cause. Method.