Commonwealth Report Legislators Method

House · Democrat

Francisco E. Paulino

Current member · 16th Essex

Data through FY2026; built October 19, 2026.

Residence

Methuen

First elected

House 2022

Occupation

Tax Lawyer/Business Consultant

Seats held, General Courts 189–194 (the FY2017–FY2026 budgets)
SessionChamberDistrictLinesNote
193rd (2023–24)House16th Essex2021 lines
194th (2025–26)House16th Essex2021 lines

Posts and stipends

No stipend payments to Francisco E. Paulino are recorded for 2016–2026.

Posts and stipends by session (stipends by calendar year)
SessionPostsFirst yearSecond year
193rd (2023–24)No post recorded$0$0
194th (2025–26)No post recorded$0$0 (to date)

Posts: the Legislature’s leadership and roster records as compiled for this project; where those name no post, the member’s committee chair, vice-chair and ranking roles from the Legislature’s member profiles. Stipends: additional compensation in the Comptroller’s payroll data (CTHRU dataset 9ttk-7vz6), 2016–2026; 2026 is the year to date. Stipends for 2015 are not available. Base salary is not included.

The district

16th Essex on its 2021 lines: 2 cities and towns, 43,728 residents (2020).

Lawrence · Methuen

Percentages are each place’s share of the district’s 2020 residents; for a town split between districts, the share of the town inside this one follows.

Population-weighted Fairness Index of the district’s cities and towns: 76 for all state aid and 50 for discretionary money (50 is a fair share).

Local earmarks are counted three ways. District money uses the first, clauses that name a place in the district; the second table adds organizations located in the district (placed in the district) and state facilities located there (everything placed). Three ways to count a local earmark.

District money, first measure: enacted earmarks in clauses naming a place in the district, by session (district money, not the member’s)
SessionDistrictDollarsIn corrective clausesPer resident per budget, rankWithout corrective clauses, rank
193rd (2023–24)16th Essex$602,000$0$6.89 · 83rd of 160$6.89 · 81st of 160
194th (2025–26)16th Essex$318,000$0$7.26 · 67th of 160$7.26 · 65th of 160

District money is where enacted earmarks land, by the place a clause names, mapped to districts by 2020 population; it is not attributed to the member and does not include leadership’s base-text money that names no place. Ranks are of district money per resident among the chamber’s districts, 1 = most. “In corrective clauses” is the part carried by a Ways and Means chair’s corrective amendments, which is leadership’s money; the last column gives the per-resident figure and rank without it. Sessions are labeled by the General Court that enacted each budget. Per-resident figures use the district as drawn for each session (2011 lines through the 192nd General Court, 2021 lines from the 193rd), so they will not equal a session’s dollars divided by the resident count above.

The same district on the other two measures, by session (enacted; includes any corrective-clause money)
SessionDistrictPlaced in the districtPer resident per budget, rankEverything placedPer resident per budget, rank
193rd (2023–24)16th Essex$1.1M$13.03 · 51st of 160$1.1M$13.03 · 58th of 160
194th (2025–26)16th Essex$562,000$12.86 · 43rd of 160$562,000$12.86 · 47th of 160

Budget amendments

Francisco E. Paulino sponsored 17 budget amendments in FY2017–FY2026, asking for $740,000 in all.

Amendments sponsored

17

FY2017–FY2026 budgets

Adopted, known outcomes

75%

12 of 16

Chamber rate, same ask sizes

61%

expected at the chamber’s rates

Of the 16 with a known outcome, 12 were adopted (75%). At the chamber’s adoption rate for amendments of the same size, about ten (61%) would have been.

Largest enacted items matched to an amendment Francisco E. Paulino filed (strong text matches)
YearAmountEnacted budget text (excerpt)Amendment
FY2026$50,000“the Greater Lawrence Community Action Council, Inc. to support the Heal Lawrence program in providing critical emergency relocation assistance…”H4000 #258
FY2026$25,000“Methuen Youth Basketball Association, Inc. to enhance youth mentorship initiatives, develop robust sports programming and strengthen violence…”H4000 #262
FY2024$25,000“the Greater Lawrence Community Action Council, Inc. to distribute to HEAL Lawrence to support victims of fires or any other disaster in the city of…”H3900 #573
FY2025$20,000“the Greater Lawrence Community Action Council, Inc. to distribute to HEAL Lawrence to support victims of fires or any other disaster in the city of…”H4600 #268
FY2025$20,000“the Methuen Youth Basketball Association Inc to support the recreational, social and health benefits the league provides to low-income youth in the…”H4600 #907

Strong matches: 5 enacted items, $140,000 (the member’s share where several amendments claim one clause). A further one weaker text match is not listed; attribution is inferred from amendment text and is less certain there. House attribution is inferred throughout, because the House adopts most amendments inside consolidated amendments.

13 outcomes are inferred by matching amendment text to the House’s consolidated amendments, because the House records most amendments only as “Consolidated A–G.” Ask size is the larger of the earmark dollars and the line-item change an amendment requests; bands: no dollar amount, under $50,000, $50,000–$250,000, $250,000–$1 million, $1–5 million, $5 million or more. Leadership’s unattributed base-text and corrective-amendment money is never assigned to a member. The comparison describes outcomes; it is not a measure of merit.

Bills sponsored

Francisco E. Paulino filed 14 bills as lead sponsor in these sessions; zero were enacted on their own. In completed sessions, 0% of their lead bills were enacted on their own, against a chamber median of 4% for the same sessions.

Most bills die in every legislature, and many policies pass inside other bills; the chamber median for the same session is the fair comparison.

Bills filed as lead sponsor, by session and outcome
SessionChamberLead billsSent to studyReported favorably, then diedPending (session open)Enacted rateChamber medianCosponsored
193rd (2023–24)House31200%4%60
194th (2025–26)House118030%*1%53

Outcomes are the furthest point each bill reached in the record. “Folded into an enacted bill” means the history names the enacted bill that absorbed it. “Passed both branches; no chapter recorded” means the bill was enacted by both branches and laid before the Governor, with no chapter or veto in the history; in the 194th General Court such bills are shown as laid before the Governor (pending). The 194th General Court is in session until January 2027, so its open bills are pending, not dead, and its rates (*) are not comparable with completed sessions. Chairs and leaders control the calendar, which raises their rates. Source: malegislature.gov bill histories.

Recorded votes on accountability measures

Francisco E. Paulino cast 19 yes-or-no votes on the 20 accountability roll calls in this file (five yes, 14 no); recorded as not voting on one.

Roll calls on rules, audits, public records, term limits and pay
DateMeasureVoteChamber result
February 1, 2023Amendment 7.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Time to review technical/ perfecting amendmentsNoYeas 23, nays 130
February 1, 2023Amendment 12.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Review of Consolidated AmendmentsNoYeas 23, nays 130
February 1, 2023House rules (H2023), rules package: on adoption of the order (contested meaning)YesYeas 153, nays 0
February 1, 2023Amendment 3.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Local Aid ResolutionNoYeas 23, nays 130
February 1, 2023Amendment 9.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Hearing ScheduleNoYeas 24, nays 129
February 1, 2023Joint rules (H2025), rules package: on adoption of the order (contested meaning)YesYeas 153, nays 0
February 25, 2025Amendment 2.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Roll CallsNoYeas 23, nays 128
February 25, 2025Amendment 3.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Formal Session NotificationNoYeas 23, nays 128
February 25, 2025Amendment 4.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): General Court AuditsNoYeas 23, nays 128
February 25, 2025Amendment 5.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Opinion of the JusticesNoYeas 23, nays 128
February 25, 2025Amendment 6.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Committee PollsNoYeas 23, nays 128
February 25, 2025Amendment 7.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Committee Poll NotificationNoYeas 23, nays 128
February 25, 2025Joint rules (H2026), rules package: on adoption of the order (contested meaning)YesYeas 128, nays 23
February 25, 2025Amendment 18.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Time to Review LegislationNoYeas 23, nays 128
February 25, 2025Amendment 17.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Audit by State AuditorNoYeas 24, nays 127
February 25, 2025Amendment 2.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Committee PollsNoYeas 23, nays 128
February 25, 2025Amendment 3.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Committee Poll NotificationsNoYeas 23, nays 128
February 25, 2025House rules (H2024), rules package: on adoption of the order (contested meaning)YesYeas 128, nays 23
June 26, 2025Joint rules (conference report) (S2545), rules package: on acceptance (contested meaning)Not votingYeas 147, nays 2
June 3, 2026Engross H.5469 (public records law applied to the Legislature). Reform advocates split (contested meaning)YesYeas 125, nays 28

Votes marked “contested meaning” are rules-package and public-records passage votes; reform advocates were on both sides of them. Descriptions are the project’s plain summaries of each question, or the question as recorded for rules-package roll calls; the official record is on malegislature.gov. Votes are facts; no score is computed.

Campaign money in

Francisco E. Paulino’s committee reported $51,000 in contributions of $250 or more in years the member served, 2023–2026.

By year (years in the Legislature)
YearContributions
2023$12,000
2024$30,000
2025$1,000
2026$8,400
By kind of contributor
KindTotalShare
Individuals$46,00089%
Political committees and PACs$5,50011%
Individuals’ money by the employer they reported
Employer reportedShare
A named employer73%
Self-employed24%
Retired1%
Not reported or withheld2%

Not counted as contributions: $38,000 in other receipts of $250 or more in the same years (candidate loans and the candidate’s own money, transfers, refunds, bank interest and aggregated small receipts).

The same committee also reported $61,000 in years the member was not in the Legislature (2017, 2021, 2022), for example while running for another office. Those receipts are not in the totals above.

Largest employers and organizations
Employer or organizationKindTotalContributions
FEMME WORKS SOLUTIONSindividuals, by employer$6,0006
MA & NORTHERN NE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL POL ACTION COMMcommittee or PAC$3,0006
ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONindividuals, by employer$3,0003
ANI CLEANINGindividuals, by employer$2,0002
CENTRAL AUTO MUSICindividuals, by employer$2,0002
RENACER FOOD MARKETindividuals, by employer$2,0002
MA CREDIT UNION LEAGUE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEEcommittee or PAC$1,0003
ABATEMENT PRO ANDE DEMOindividuals, by employer$1,0001
WALL TO WALL CONTRACTINGindividuals, by employer$1,0001
CALDERON SUPERMARKET RESTAURANTindividuals, by employer$1,0001

Source: Office of Campaign and Political Finance, itemized receipts of $250 or more since 2015; OCPF filer record: Paulino Committee (CPF 16733). Individuals are grouped by the employer they reported; no individual contributor is named, and an employer field that is a person’s name is withheld. Massachusetts bars business contributions to candidates. Employer shows affiliation, not instruction.

Sources

Every figure traces to a public record.

Facts only: posts, stipends, sponsored amendments, enacted items, roll-call votes and district money. No score or grade is computed. Associations shown here are not evidence of cause. Method.