Commonwealth Report Legislators Method

Senate · Democrat

Diana DiZoglio

Former member, served 2015–2022 in the sessions covered here · First Essex

Data through FY2026; built October 19, 2026.

Residence

Methuen

First elected

House 2012; Senate 2018

Left office

did not seek reelection in 2022 (not a candidate in the 2022 primary or general election for this seat); term ended January 4, 2023

Seats held, General Courts 189–194 (the FY2017–FY2026 budgets)
SessionChamberDistrictLinesNote
189th (2015–16)House14th Essex2011 lines
190th (2017–18)House14th Essex2011 lines
191st (2019–20)SenateFirst Essex2011 linesmoved from the House to the Senate
192nd (2021–22)SenateFirst Essex2011 lines

Posts and stipends

Diana DiZoglio was paid $89,662 in leadership and committee stipends from 2019 to 2022.

Posts and stipends by session (stipends by calendar year)
SessionPostsFirst yearSecond year
189th (2015–16)No post recordednot available$0
190th (2017–18)No post recorded$0$0
191st (2019–20)Chair, Joint Committee on Community Development and Small Businesses; Vice chair, Joint Committee on Children, Families and Persons with Disabilities$21,881$21,881
192nd (2021–22)Chair, Joint Committee on Export Development; Vice chair, Joint Committee on Municipalities and Regional Government$22,951$22,951

Posts: the Legislature’s leadership and roster records as compiled for this project; where those name no post, the member’s committee chair, vice-chair and ranking roles from the Legislature’s member profiles. Stipends: additional compensation in the Comptroller’s payroll data (CTHRU dataset 9ttk-7vz6), 2016–2026; 2026 is the year to date. Stipends for 2015 are not available. Base salary is not included.

The district

First Essex on its 2011 lines: 7 cities and towns, 187,786 residents (2020).

Haverhill · Methuen · Newburyport · Amesbury · North Andover · Salisbury · Merrimac

Percentages are each place’s share of the district’s 2020 residents; for a town split between districts, the share of the town inside this one follows.

Population-weighted Fairness Index of the district’s cities and towns: 49 for all state aid and 53 for discretionary money (50 is a fair share).

Local earmarks are counted three ways. District money uses the first, clauses that name a place in the district; the second table adds organizations located in the district (placed in the district) and state facilities located there (everything placed). Three ways to count a local earmark.

District money, first measure: enacted earmarks in clauses naming a place in the district, by session (district money, not the member’s)
SessionDistrictDollarsIn corrective clausesPer resident per budget, rankWithout corrective clauses, rank
189th (2015–16)14th Essex$109,000$3,240$2.29 · 89th of 160$2.22 · 90th of 160
190th (2017–18)14th Essex$365,000$13,000$3.83 · 87th of 160$3.69 · 91st of 160
191st (2019–20)First Essex$1.7M$0$4.59 · 15th of 40$4.59 · 15th of 40
192nd (2021–22)First Essex$2.7M$32,000$7.07 · 23rd of 40$6.99 · 24th of 40

District money is where enacted earmarks land, by the place a clause names, mapped to districts by 2020 population; it is not attributed to the member and does not include leadership’s base-text money that names no place. Ranks are of district money per resident among the chamber’s districts, 1 = most. “In corrective clauses” is the part carried by a Ways and Means chair’s corrective amendments, which is leadership’s money; the last column gives the per-resident figure and rank without it. Sessions are labeled by the General Court that enacted each budget. Per-resident figures use the district as drawn for each session (2011 lines through the 192nd General Court, 2021 lines from the 193rd), so they will not equal a session’s dollars divided by the resident count above.

The same district on the other two measures, by session (enacted; includes any corrective-clause money)
SessionDistrictPlaced in the districtPer resident per budget, rankEverything placedPer resident per budget, rank
189th (2015–16)14th Essex$119,000$2.50 · 99th of 160$119,000$2.50 · 102nd of 160
190th (2017–18)14th Essex$384,000$4.02 · 88th of 160$384,000$4.02 · 93rd of 160
191st (2019–20)First Essex$1.7M$4.64 · 25th of 40$1.8M$4.80 · 26th of 40
192nd (2021–22)First Essex$2.6M$6.86 · 33rd of 40$2.9M$7.66 · 28th of 40

Budget amendments

Diana DiZoglio sponsored 179 budget amendments in FY2017–FY2026, asking for $124 million in all.

Amendments sponsored

179

FY2017–FY2026 budgets

Adopted, known outcomes

50%

87 of 174

Chamber rate, same ask sizes

48%

expected at the chamber’s rates

Of the 174 with a known outcome, 87 were adopted (50%). At the chamber’s adoption rate for amendments of the same size, about 83 (48%) would have been.

Largest enacted items matched to an amendment Diana DiZoglio filed (strong text matches)
YearAmountEnacted budget text (excerpt)Amendment
FY2020$500,000“families and individuals who are at risk of injury or harm due to domestic violence in their current housing situation and whose household income is…”S3 #1007
FY2020$200,000“organizations providing tax assistance services to individuals and families qualifying for the volunteer income tax assistance program, in…”S3 #12
FY2018$200,000“Career Resources Corporation in Haverhill toward employment services for veterans with disabilities”H3600 #405
FY2017$200,000“Career Resources Corporation in Haverhill toward employment services for veterans with disabilities”H4200 #895
FY2020$150,000“a pilot program in the Merrimack Valley to provide transportation services to detoxification and rehabilitation facilities in coordination with the…”S3 #569

Strong matches: 52 enacted items, $2.9 million (the member’s share where several amendments claim one clause). A further one weaker text match is not listed; attribution is inferred from amendment text and is less certain there. House attribution is inferred throughout, because the House adopts most amendments inside consolidated amendments.

36 outcomes are inferred by matching amendment text to the House’s consolidated amendments, because the House records most amendments only as “Consolidated A–G.” For 8 amendments the sponsor is the first mover named in the amendment text, because the Legislature’s record listed none. Ask size is the larger of the earmark dollars and the line-item change an amendment requests; bands: no dollar amount, under $50,000, $50,000–$250,000, $250,000–$1 million, $1–5 million, $5 million or more. Leadership’s unattributed base-text and corrective-amendment money is never assigned to a member. The comparison describes outcomes; it is not a measure of merit.

Bills sponsored

Diana DiZoglio filed 392 bills as lead sponsor in these sessions; 16 were enacted on their own. In completed sessions, 4% of their lead bills were enacted on their own, against chamber medians of 2% to 7% for the same sessions.

Most bills die in every legislature, and many policies pass inside other bills; the chamber median for the same session is the fair comparison.

Bills filed as lead sponsor, by session and outcome
SessionChamberLead billsEnactedFolded into an enacted billSent to studyReported favorably, then diedReported adversely or withdrawnNo actionEnacted rateChamber medianCosponsored
189th (2015–16)House3531206059%6%208
190th (2017–18)House5521465014%7%224
191st (2019–20)Senate135458227983%3%377
192nd (2021–22)Senate1677311832074%2%326

Enacted bills as lead sponsor

Show all 16

Outcomes are the furthest point each bill reached in the record. “Folded into an enacted bill” means the history names the enacted bill that absorbed it. “Passed both branches; no chapter recorded” means the bill was enacted by both branches and laid before the Governor, with no chapter or veto in the history; in the 194th General Court such bills are shown as laid before the Governor (pending). The 194th General Court is in session until January 2027, so its open bills are pending, not dead, and its rates (*) are not comparable with completed sessions. Chairs and leaders control the calendar, which raises their rates. Source: malegislature.gov bill histories.

Recorded votes on accountability measures

Diana DiZoglio cast 49 yes-or-no votes on the 50 accountability roll calls in this file (27 yes, 22 no, one for a named candidate).

Roll calls on rules, audits, public records, term limits and pay
DateMeasureVoteChamber result
January 25, 2017Recommit the 2017 pay-raise bill (H.58) to Ways and MeansNoYeas 35, nays 125
January 25, 2017Amd 3 (Lyons): legislators' raise not effective until next General CourtYesYeas 40, nays 120
January 25, 2017Amd 5 (Lyons): cap the increases at 4%NoYeas 36, nays 124
January 25, 2017Engrossment of the pay-raise bill (stipend increases)NoYeas 116, nays 44
January 26, 2017Enactment of the pay-raise billNoYeas 116, nays 43
February 2, 2017Override of Gov. Baker's veto of the pay-raise billNoYeas 116, nays 43
February 2, 2017Amendment 1.0 (Geoff Diehl): Text of the proposed House amendment (Representative Diehl) to the House Bill relative to Rank and File (House, No. 2017)NoYeas 34, nays 124
February 2, 2017Sustain the Chair's ruling (point of order, Mr. Mark) against Diehl amd 2, Speaker term limitsYesYeas 123, nays 33
February 2, 2017Amendment 3.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): 24 Hour Time Frame for Bills to Be Acted OnNoYeas 35, nays 124
February 2, 2017Amendment 4.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Access to InformationNoYeas 35, nays 124
February 2, 2017Amendment 9.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Emergency Scheduling of HearingsNoYeas 38, nays 121
February 2, 2017Amendment 10.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Equal Representation on Ethics CommitteeNoYeas 35, nays 124
February 2, 2017Amendment 15.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): InoculatorsNoYeas 37, nays 122
February 2, 2017Amendment 16.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Local Aid ResolutionNoYeas 38, nays 121
February 2, 2017Amendment 27.0 (James J. Lyons, Jr.): Defining and Limiting Informal SessionNoYeas 34, nays 124
February 2, 2017Amendment 20.0 (Shaunna L. O'Connell): Public access to House financial accounts auditsNoYeas 34, nays 125
February 2, 2017Amendment 21.0 (Shaunna L. O'Connell): Public access to committee votesYesYeas 41, nays 118
February 2, 2017Amendment 5.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Local Aid ResolutionNoYeas 37, nays 122
February 2, 2017Amendment 11.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Committee Roll Calls on WebsiteNoYeas 38, nays 121
February 2, 2017Amendment 13.0 (Bradley H. Jones, Jr.): Reports of Conference Filing DeadlineNoYeas 37, nays 122
February 2, 2017Amendment 14.0 (Shaunna L. O'Connell): Public access to committee votesNoYeas 38, nays 121
January 31, 2019Amendment 1.1 (Bruce E. Tarr): Posting of Committee Roll Call VotesYesYeas 39, nays 0
January 31, 2019Amendment 1.0 (Walter F. Timilty): Improving Access to RecordsYesYeas 39, nays 0
January 31, 2019Amendment 2.0 (Bruce E. Tarr): Informal SessionYesYeas 39, nays 0
January 31, 2019Amendment 3.0 (Bruce E. Tarr): Conference Committee ReportNoYeas 8, nays 31
January 31, 2019Amendment 11.0 (Bruce E. Tarr): Audit of accountsYesYeas 39, nays 0
not availableJoint rules (S9), rules package: question on acceptance of the report (contested meaning)YesYeas 39, nays 0
January 31, 2019Amendment 1.0 (Diana DiZoglio): Non disclosure agreementsYesYeas 39, nays 0
January 31, 2019Amendment 7.1 (Rebecca L. Rausch): anti-harassment and assaultYesYeas 39, nays 0
January 31, 2019Amendment 5.0 (Bruce E. Tarr): Numbers of bills considered at a hearingNoYeas 8, nays 31
January 31, 2019Amendment 17.0 (Ryan C. Fattman): Matters considered in an informal sessionNoYeas 6, nays 33
January 31, 2019Amendment 25.0 (Bruce E. Tarr): Unanimous consentNoYeas 6, nays 33
not availableSenate rules (S8), rules package: question on acceptance of the report (contested meaning)YesYeas 39, nays 0
not availableSenate President election (contested meaning)Voted for Karen E. Spilkanot available
February 11, 2021Amendment 3.0 (Bruce E. Tarr): Members receiving SWM GAA recommendationYesYeas 4, nays 35
February 11, 2021Amendment 6.0 (Bruce E. Tarr): Unanimous consent to go past midnightYesYeas 6, nays 34
February 11, 2021Amendment 7.0 (Bruce E. Tarr): Going past 10 pmYesYeas 6, nays 34
February 11, 2021Amendment 8.0 (Bruce E. Tarr): Successive formal sessionsYesYeas 6, nays 34
February 11, 2021Amendment 15.0 (Diana DiZoglio): Anti-harassment and bystander intervention trainingYesYeas 10, nays 29
February 11, 2021Amendment 20.0 (Diana DiZoglio): Amendments to other appropriations billsYesYeas 5, nays 34
February 11, 2021Accessibility; adopted 39-0 (contested meaning)YesYeas 39, nays 0
February 11, 2021Supplier diversity; adopted 39-0 (contested meaning)YesYeas 39, nays 0
February 11, 2021Amendment 42.0 (Bruce E. Tarr): Consideration of further and redrafted amendmentsYesYeas 7, nays 32
February 11, 2021Amendment 44.0 (Bruce E. Tarr): HearingsYesYeas 6, nays 33
February 11, 2021Amendment 49.0 (Ryan C. Fattman): Adoption amendment - Rule 24YesYeas 5, nays 34
February 11, 2021Minority Leader appointments to committees (partisan allocation) (contested meaning)YesYeas 4, nays 35
February 11, 2021Amendment 24.0 (Diana DiZoglio): Notice of legislative mattersYesYeas 5, nays 34
February 11, 2021Amendment 1.0 (Bruce E. Tarr): New items on the calendarYesYeas 5, nays 34
February 11, 2021Amendment 1.0 (Bruce E. Tarr): Filing of conference committee reportYesYeas 6, nays 33
February 11, 2021Amendment 14.0 (James B. Eldridge): Lengthening public notice period for legislative hearingsYesYeas 39, nays 0

Votes marked “contested meaning” are rules-package and public-records passage votes; reform advocates were on both sides of them. Descriptions are the project’s plain summaries of each question, or the question as recorded for rules-package roll calls; the official record is on malegislature.gov. Votes are facts; no score is computed.

Campaign money in

Diana DiZoglio’s committee reported $873,000 in contributions of $250 or more in years the member served, 2015–2022.

By year (years in the Legislature)
YearContributions
2015$11,000
2016$19,000
2017$16,000
2018$128,000
2019$48,000
2020$12,000
2021$229,000
2022$410,000
By kind of contributor
KindTotalShare
Individuals$699,00080%
Political committees and PACs$115,00013%
Unions and associations$59,0007%
Individuals’ money by the employer they reported
Employer reportedShare
A named employer58%
Self-employed23%
Retired4%
Not employed8%
Studentunder 1%
Homemaker or at home2%
Not reported or withheld5%

Not counted as contributions: $105,000 in other receipts of $250 or more in the same years (candidate loans and the candidate’s own money, transfers, refunds, bank interest and aggregated small receipts).

The same committee also reported $478,000 in years the member was not in the Legislature (2023, 2024, 2025, 2026), for example while running for another office. Those receipts are not in the totals above.

Largest employers and organizations
Employer or organizationKindTotalContributions
MA DEMOCRATIC STATE COMMITTEE COMMITTEEcommittee or PAC$21,0001
MASSACHUSETTS DEMOCRATIC STATE COMMITTEEcommittee or PAC$18,0001
WHITTIER HEALTHindividuals, by employer$11,00012
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTSindividuals, by employer$10,00019
SPS NEW ENGLANDindividuals, by employer$9,0009
TRINITY AMBULANCEindividuals, by employer$5,60014
LIUNA - LOCAL 175union or association$5,2005
CITY OF HAVERHILLindividuals, by employer$5,0007
METHUEN POLICE DEPARTMENTindividuals, by employer$5,00012
BUTCHER BOYindividuals, by employer$4,5007

Source: Office of Campaign and Political Finance, itemized receipts of $250 or more since 2015; OCPF filer record: DiZoglio Committee (CPF 15465). Individuals are grouped by the employer they reported; no individual contributor is named, and an employer field that is a person’s name is withheld. Massachusetts bars business contributions to candidates. Employer shows affiliation, not instruction.

Sources

Every figure traces to a public record.

Facts only: posts, stipends, sponsored amendments, enacted items, roll-call votes and district money. No score or grade is computed. Associations shown here are not evidence of cause. Method.