Senate · Democrat

Barbara A. L'Italien

Former member, served 2015–2018 in the sessions covered here · Second Essex and Middlesex

Data through FY2026; built October 19, 2026.

Residence

Andover

First elected

House 2002; Senate 2014

Prior public offices

Andover School Committee (2013-2015)

Occupation

social worker

Left office

did not seek reelection in 2018 (not a candidate in the 2018 primary or general election for this seat); term ended January 2, 2019

Seats held, General Courts 189–194 (the FY2017–FY2026 budgets)
Session	Chamber	District	Lines	Note
189th (2015–16)	Senate	Second Essex and Middlesex	2011 lines
190th (2017–18)	Senate	Second Essex and Middlesex	2011 lines

Posts and stipends

Barbara A. L'Italien was paid $75,000 in leadership and committee stipends from 2016 to 2018.

Posts and stipends by session (stipends by calendar year)
Session	Posts	First year	Second year
189th (2015–16)	Chair, Joint Committee on Consumer Protection and Professional Licensure; Vice chair, Senate Committee on Intergovernmental Affairs	not available	$15,000
190th (2017–18)	Chair, Joint Committee on Consumer Protection and Professional Licensure; Vice chair, Senate Committee on Bills in the Third Reading	$30,000	$30,000

Posts: the Legislature’s leadership and roster records as compiled for this project; where those name no post, the member’s committee chair, vice-chair and ranking roles from the Legislature’s member profiles. Stipends: additional compensation in the Comptroller’s payroll data (CTHRU dataset 9ttk-7vz6), 2016–2026; 2026 is the year to date. Stipends for 2015 are not available. Base salary is not included.

The district

Second Essex and Middlesex on its 2011 lines: 4 cities and towns, 189,671 residents (2020).

Lawrence 47% · Andover 19% · Dracut 17% · Tewksbury 17%

Percentages are each place’s share of the district’s 2020 residents; for a town split between districts, the share of the town inside this one follows.

Population-weighted Fairness Index of the district’s cities and towns: 58 for all state aid and 37 for discretionary money (50 is a fair share).

Local earmarks are counted three ways. District money uses the first, clauses that name a place in the district; the second table adds organizations located in the district (placed in the district) and state facilities located there (everything placed). Three ways to count a local earmark.

District money, first measure: enacted earmarks in clauses naming a place in the district, by session (district money, not the member’s)
Session	District	Dollars	In corrective clauses	Per resident per budget, rank	Without corrective clauses, rank
189th (2015–16)	Second Essex and Middlesex	$608,000	$0	$3.21 · 21st of 40	$3.21 · 21st of 40
190th (2017–18)	Second Essex and Middlesex	$2.1M	$0	$5.65 · 8th of 40	$5.65 · 8th of 40

District money is where enacted earmarks land, by the place a clause names, mapped to districts by 2020 population; it is not attributed to the member and does not include leadership’s base-text money that names no place. Ranks are of district money per resident among the chamber’s districts, 1 = most. “In corrective clauses” is the part carried by a Ways and Means chair’s corrective amendments, which is leadership’s money; the last column gives the per-resident figure and rank without it. Sessions are labeled by the General Court that enacted each budget. Per-resident figures use the district as drawn for each session (2011 lines through the 192nd General Court, 2021 lines from the 193rd), so they will not equal a session’s dollars divided by the resident count above.

The same district on the other two measures, by session (enacted; includes any corrective-clause money)
Session	District	Placed in the district	Per resident per budget, rank	Everything placed	Per resident per budget, rank
189th (2015–16)	Second Essex and Middlesex	$733,000	$3.87 · 22nd of 40	$733,000	$3.87 · 22nd of 40
190th (2017–18)	Second Essex and Middlesex	$2.2M	$5.93 · 14th of 40	$2.2M	$5.93 · 18th of 40

Budget amendments

Barbara A. L'Italien sponsored 121 budget amendments in FY2017–FY2026, asking for $74.8 million in all.

Amendments sponsored

121

FY2017–FY2026 budgets

Adopted, known outcomes

37%

45 of 121

Chamber rate, same ask sizes

42%

expected at the chamber’s rates

Of the 121 with a known outcome, 45 were adopted (37%). At the chamber’s adoption rate for amendments of the same size, about 51 (42%) would have been.

Largest enacted items matched to an amendment Barbara A. L'Italien filed (strong text matches)
Year	Amount	Enacted budget text (excerpt)	Amendment
FY2018	$250,000	“not less than $250,000 for the first year of a 4-year pilot program to establish a county restoration center overseen by the Middlesex county…”	S3 #913
FY2019	$108,000	“continued operation of the Autism Insurance Resource Center at the University of Massachusetts Medical School’s Eunice Kennedy Shriver Center to p”	S4 #537
FY2019	$100,000	“the town of Andover for the final phase of the route 133 corridor project plan development project”	S4 #1176
FY2018	$100,000	“the town of Andover for improvements related to the Historic Mill District”	S3 #754
FY2018	$100,000	“the town of Dracut for communications tower replacement for Marsh Hill”	S3 #947

Strong matches: 25 enacted items, $1.7 million (the member’s share where several amendments claim one clause).

For 36 amendments the sponsor is the first mover named in the amendment text, because the Legislature’s record listed none. Ask size is the larger of the earmark dollars and the line-item change an amendment requests; bands: no dollar amount, under $50,000, $50,000–$250,000, $250,000–$1 million, $1–5 million, $5 million or more. Leadership’s unattributed base-text and corrective-amendment money is never assigned to a member. The comparison describes outcomes; it is not a measure of merit.

Bills sponsored

Barbara A. L'Italien filed 107 bills as lead sponsor in these sessions; three were enacted on their own. In completed sessions, 3% of their lead bills were enacted on their own, against chamber medians of 3% to 4% for the same sessions.

Most bills die in every legislature, and many policies pass inside other bills; the chamber median for the same session is the fair comparison.

Bills filed as lead sponsor, by session and outcome
Session	Chamber	Lead bills	Enacted	Folded into an enacted bill	Sent to study	Reported favorably, then died	Reported adversely or withdrawn	No action	Enacted rate	Chamber median	Cosponsored
189th (2015–16)	Senate	40	3	0	20	12	0	5	8%	4%	489
190th (2017–18)	Senate	67	0	4	34	21	4	4	0%	3%	579

Enacted bills as lead sponsor

S1983 (189th): An Act authorizing the town of Andover school district to convey a certain parcel of land · Chapter 146 of the Acts of 2016
S2368 (189th): An Act eliminating sub-precinct 9A in the town of Andover · Chapter 320 of the Acts of 2016
S2511 (189th): An Act creating a municipal services facility mitigation fund for the town of Andover · Chapter 403 of the Acts of 2016

Outcomes are the furthest point each bill reached in the record. “Folded into an enacted bill” means the history names the enacted bill that absorbed it. “Passed both branches; no chapter recorded” means the bill was enacted by both branches and laid before the Governor, with no chapter or veto in the history; in the 194th General Court such bills are shown as laid before the Governor (pending). The 194th General Court is in session until January 2027, so its open bills are pending, not dead, and its rates (*) are not comparable with completed sessions. Chairs and leaders control the calendar, which raises their rates. Source: malegislature.gov bill histories.

Recorded votes on accountability measures

Barbara A. L'Italien cast eight yes-or-no votes on the eight accountability roll calls in this file (five yes, three no).

Roll calls on rules, audits, public records, term limits and pay
Date	Measure	Vote	Chamber result
January 26, 2017	Senate engrossment of the pay-raise bill	Yes	Yeas 31, nays 9
February 2, 2017	Amendment 2.0 (Bruce E. Tarr): Matters considered in an informal session	Yes	Yeas 38, nays 0
February 2, 2017	Amendment 3.0 (Bruce E. Tarr): Time to consider matters in an informal	Yes	Yeas 39, nays 0
February 2, 2017	Amendment 7.0 (Bruce E. Tarr): Provided with text of bills prior to poll	Yes	Yeas 39, nays 0
February 2, 2017	Special orders by majority instead of two-thirds (contested meaning)	No	Yeas 6, nays 33
February 2, 2017	Amendment 11.0 (Bruce E. Tarr): Unanimous consent	No	Yeas 6, nays 33
February 2, 2017	Amendment 13.0 (Bruce E. Tarr): Timely Local Aid Notification	No	Yeas 7, nays 32
February 2, 2017	Senate override of the veto of the pay-raise bill	Yes	Yeas 31, nays 9

Votes marked “contested meaning” are rules-package and public-records passage votes; reform advocates were on both sides of them. Descriptions are the project’s plain summaries of each question, or the question as recorded for rules-package roll calls; the official record is on malegislature.gov. Votes are facts; no score is computed.

Campaign money in

Barbara A. L'Italien’s committee reported $124,000 in contributions of $250 or more in years the member served, 2015–2018.

By year (years in the Legislature)
Year	Contributions
2015	$35,000
2016	$71,000
2017	$18,000
2018	$0

By kind of contributor
Kind	Total	Share
Individuals	$80,000	65%
Political committees and PACs	$36,000	29%
Unions and associations	$7,339	6%

Individuals’ money by the employer they reported
Employer reported	Share
A named employer	70%
Self-employed	11%
Retired	1%
Not employed	1%
Homemaker or at home	2%
Not reported or withheld	15%

Not counted as contributions: $4,551 in other receipts of $250 or more in the same years (candidate loans and the candidate’s own money, transfers, refunds, bank interest and aggregated small receipts).

The same committee also reported $0 in years the member was not in the Legislature (2019), for example while running for another office. Those receipts are not in the totals above.

Largest employers and organizations
Employer or organization	Kind	Total	Contributions
DOUBLE N	individuals, by employer	$3,500	4
BOSTON BEER BREWERY	individuals, by employer	$3,000	3
WATER REV	individuals, by employer	$3,000	3
L KNIFE AND SON	individuals, by employer	$2,000	2
SHRIVER CENTER	individuals, by employer	$2,000	2
BOSTON BEER	individuals, by employer	$2,000	2
RETIRED PUBLIC EMPLOYEES PAC	committee or PAC	$1,800	4
1199 SEIU MA PAC	committee or PAC	$1,500	3
BOSTON CARMEN'S UNION PAC	committee or PAC	$1,500	3
CARPENTERS LOCAL UNION 111 PAC	committee or PAC	$1,500	3

Source: Office of Campaign and Political Finance, itemized receipts of $250 or more since 2015; OCPF filer record: L'Italien Committee (CPF 13959). Individuals are grouped by the employer they reported; no individual contributor is named, and an employer field that is a person’s name is withheld. Massachusetts bars business contributions to candidates. Employer shows affiliation, not instruction.

Sources

Every figure traces to a public record.

Facts only: posts, stipends, sponsored amendments, enacted items, roll-call votes and district money. No score or grade is computed. Associations shown here are not evidence of cause. Method.